
Wyoming
18-15GAME THAT MATTERSAT
43.4%Wyoming
56.6%Furman
MMH WIN PROBABILITY
MODEL SPREADFurman -3.1
PROJECTED TOTAL150.2
MODEL MONEYLINEFurman -130

Furman
22-13MMH MODEL PROJECTION
Projected ScoreWyoming 74
Projected Total150.2
Projected ScoreFurman 77
Team Comparison
56.1MMH Power Index53.9
113.4Offensive Efficiency113.3
107.7Defensive Efficiency105.1
5.7Net Efficiency8.2
2.2Strength of Schedule-1.8
1.4Last 10 Net Efficiency4.6
67.8Tempo67.4
52.2%Effective FG%55.4%
16.2%Turnover Rate17.7%
34.6%Offensive Rebound %31.7%
36.7%Free Throw Rate32.6%
3.9Average Margin5.5
MMH GAME INTELLIGENCE
MODEL READ
Wyoming HAS THE EDGE
WIN PROBABILITY56.6%
STATISTICAL ADVANTAGE
6–5
MMH comparison metrics
WHERE THE EDGE COMES FROMWyoming holds the advantage in MMH Power Index (56.1–53.9), offensive efficiency (113.4–113.3), strength of schedule (2.2–-1.8), ball security (16.2–17.7).
Furman COUNTERS WITHdefensive efficiency (105.1–107.7), net efficiency (8.2–5.7), recent form (4.6–1.4).