
Southern Miss
19-16GAME THAT MATTERSAT
17.7%Southern Miss
82.3%Utah Valley
MMH WIN PROBABILITY
MODEL SPREADUtah Valley -12.3
PROJECTED TOTAL150.3
MODEL MONEYLINEUtah Valley -465

Utah Valley
25-9MMH MODEL PROJECTION
Projected ScoreSouthern Miss 69
Projected Total150.3
Projected ScoreUtah Valley 81
Team Comparison
49.9MMH Power Index59.1
106.1Offensive Efficiency113.4
104.9Defensive Efficiency97.3
1.2Net Efficiency16.1
-0.2Strength of Schedule-3.3
3.8Last 10 Net Efficiency6.8
70.4Tempo70.6
49.9%Effective FG%56.0%
18.4%Turnover Rate19.9%
32.3%Offensive Rebound %36.2%
43.9%Free Throw Rate37.3%
0.9Average Margin11.4
MMH GAME INTELLIGENCE
MODEL READ
Utah Valley HAS THE EDGE
WIN PROBABILITY82.3%
STATISTICAL ADVANTAGE
8–3
MMH comparison metrics
WHERE THE EDGE COMES FROMUtah Valley holds the advantage in MMH Power Index (59.1–49.9), offensive efficiency (113.4–106.1), defensive efficiency (97.3–104.9), net efficiency (16.1–1.2).
Southern Miss COUNTERS WITHstrength of schedule (-0.2–-3.3), ball security (18.4–19.9), free throw rate (43.9–37.3).