UT Martin logo

UT Martin

22-11
GAME THAT MATTERSAT
60.0%UT Martin
40.0%Prairie View A&M
MMH WIN PROBABILITY
MODEL SPREADUT Martin -2.7
PROJECTED TOTAL144.0
MODEL MONEYLINEUT Martin -150
Prairie View A&M logo

Prairie View A&M

19-18
MMH MODEL PROJECTION
Projected ScoreUT Martin 73
Projected Total144.0
Projected ScorePrairie View A&M 71

Team Comparison

49.8MMH Power Index41.6
103.8Offensive Efficiency105.6
94.0Defensive Efficiency103.9
9.8Net Efficiency1.7
-4.8Strength of Schedule-9.8
-0.8Last 10 Net Efficiency4.4
67.2Tempo73.8
49.5%Effective FG%49.2%
21.4%Turnover Rate15.9%
37.9%Offensive Rebound %27.7%
37.5%Free Throw Rate42.9%
6.6Average Margin1.3
MMH GAME INTELLIGENCE
MODEL READ

UT Martin HAS THE EDGE

WIN PROBABILITY60.0%
STATISTICAL ADVANTAGE
7–4
MMH comparison metrics
WHERE THE EDGE COMES FROMUT Martin holds the advantage in MMH Power Index (49.8–41.6), defensive efficiency (94.0–103.9), net efficiency (9.8–1.7), strength of schedule (-4.8–-9.8).
Prairie View A&M COUNTERS WITHoffensive efficiency (105.6–103.8), recent form (4.4–-0.8), ball security (15.9–21.4).
Final
UT Martin logo
UT Martin
66—78
Prairie View A&M logo
Prairie View A&M
Prairie View A&M by 12 • 74.3 estimated possessions

Team Stats

UT MartinTEAM STATPrairie View A&M
25-69FG29-64
36.0%FG%45.0%
6-203PT4-11
30.0%3PT%36.0%
10-13FT16-24
77.0%FT%67.0%
39Rebounds44
11Offensive Rebounds10
11Assists17
11Turnovers8
4Steals9
3Blocks5
17Fouls12

Player Box Score

UT Martin
PlayerPosMinFG3PTFTREBASTSTLBLKTOPFPTS
Jordan SearsGuard389-252-63-345100023
Issa MuhammadForward347-100-01-1133000015
Jacob CrewsG365-163-80-0101010013
KK CurryForward182-40-02-31011006
Christian FussellForward61-11-12-20000005
Jalen MyersF261-80-22-23110004
Koby JeffriesGuard160-00-00-02001000
Desmond WilliamsGuard150-10-10-20100000
Justus JacksonGuard110-40-20-02010000
Prairie View A&M
PlayerPosMinFG3PTFTREBASTSTLBLKTOPFPTS
Charles Smith IVGuard376-152-64-684200018
Brian MylesForward328-131-11-2142120018
Nick GazelasGuard406-140-20-011000012
Chris Felix Jr.Forward285-100-02-221000012
Andre NunleyG262-50-06-8104620010
Orlando Horton Jr.G141-40-12-41200004
Charles Lane Jr.Guard91-31-10-03200003
Syrus GrisbyForward80-00-01-22101001
McKinley HarrisForward60-00-00-00000000

Advanced Game Stats

74.3Possessions74.3
88.8Offensive Efficiency105.0
105.0Defensive Efficiency88.8
-16.2Net Efficiency16.2
40.6%Effective FG%48.4%
43.9%True Shooting %51.7%
14.6%Turnover Rate10.9%
18.8%Free Throw Rate37.5%
29.0%3-Point Rate17.2%
1.00Assist / Turnover2.13
Game Summary
Prairie View A&M won by 12 points. The game played at approximately 74.3 possessions. The largest advanced-stat separations came in Net Efficiency, Free Throw Rate, Offensive Efficiency.

Advanced game metrics are calculated by Mid-Major Hoops from team box-score totals. Possessions are estimated. Highlighted advanced values indicate the stronger result for that metric; lower is better for defensive efficiency and turnover rate.