
Weber State
16-16GAME THAT MATTERSAT
41.3%Weber State
58.7%Colgate
MMH WIN PROBABILITY
MODEL SPREADColgate -2.6
PROJECTED TOTAL157.9
MODEL MONEYLINEColgate -142

Colgate
18-15MMH MODEL PROJECTION
Projected ScoreWeber State 78
Projected Total157.9
Projected ScoreColgate 80
Team Comparison
50.2MMH Power Index48.8
113.6Offensive Efficiency111.7
108.2Defensive Efficiency109.0
5.4Net Efficiency2.7
-3.4Strength of Schedule-2.0
-1.8Last 10 Net Efficiency-0.3
71.5Tempo68.4
52.6%Effective FG%54.5%
15.5%Turnover Rate14.8%
32.6%Offensive Rebound %26.9%
38.3%Free Throw Rate30.0%
3.9Average Margin1.8
MMH GAME INTELLIGENCE
MODEL READ
Weber State HAS THE EDGE
WIN PROBABILITY58.7%
STATISTICAL ADVANTAGE
7–4
MMH comparison metrics
WHERE THE EDGE COMES FROMWeber State holds the advantage in MMH Power Index (50.2–48.8), offensive efficiency (113.6–111.7), defensive efficiency (108.2–109.0), net efficiency (5.4–2.7).
Colgate COUNTERS WITHstrength of schedule (-2.0–-3.4), recent form (-0.3–-1.8), shooting efficiency (54.5–52.6).