Lindenwood

18-15

GAME THAT MATTERSAT

21.6%Lindenwood

78.4%William & Mary

MMH WIN PROBABILITY

MODEL SPREADWilliam & Mary -7.8

PROJECTED TOTAL159.0

MODEL MONEYLINEWilliam & Mary -363

William & Mary

20-12

MMH MODEL PROJECTION

Projected ScoreLindenwood 76

Projected Total159.0

Projected ScoreWilliam & Mary 83

Team Comparison

LindenwoodMetricWilliam & Mary

46.8MMH Power Index53.8

105.5Offensive Efficiency112.5

98.6Defensive Efficiency105.2

6.9Net Efficiency7.3

-6.8Strength of Schedule-1.5

-1.4Last 10 Net Efficiency3.5

73.7Tempo73.9

50.2%Effective FG%55.3%

18.3%Turnover Rate16.4%

34.0%Offensive Rebound %26.7%

37.9%Free Throw Rate45.3%

5.1Average Margin5.4

MMH GAME INTELLIGENCE

MODEL READ

William & Mary HAS THE EDGE

WIN PROBABILITY78.4%

STATISTICAL ADVANTAGE

9–2

MMH comparison metrics

WHERE THE EDGE COMES FROMWilliam & Mary holds the advantage in MMH Power Index (53.8–46.8), offensive efficiency (112.5–105.5), net efficiency (7.3–6.9), strength of schedule (-1.5–-6.8).

Lindenwood COUNTERS WITHdefensive efficiency (98.6–105.2), offensive rebounding (34.0–26.7).

Final

Lindenwood

71—60

William & Mary

Lindenwood by 11 • 69.0 estimated possessions

Team Stats

LindenwoodTEAM STATWilliam & Mary

24-55FG20-54

44.0%FG%37.0%

10-213PT6-25

48.0%3PT%24.0%

13-19FT14-21

68.0%FT%67.0%

36Rebounds38

6Offensive Rebounds9

10Assists9

11Turnovers14

5Steals4

4Blocks1

21Fouls21

Player Box Score

Lindenwood

Player	Pos	Min	FG	3PT	FT	REB	AST	STL	BLK	PTS
Darius Beane	Guard	36	10-19	0-0	5-9	4	2	0	0	25
Keith Haymon II	Forward	30	5-9	5-7	0-0	7	1	0	0	15
Keenon Cole	Forward	36	4-12	2-6	3-4	7	3	2	3	13
Jeremiah Talton	F	29	3-7	2-5	0-0	6	0	1	0	8
Colin Ruffin	G	16	1-2	1-1	0-0	2	1	1	0	3
Tommie Williams	Guard	15	0-0	0-0	2-2	1	1	0	0	2
Isaac Ondekane	C	14	1-2	0-0	0-0	2	0	0	0	2
Nathan Johnson Jr.	Guard	11	0-2	0-2	2-2	2	0	0	1	2
Jaylon McDaniel	F	13	0-2	0-0	1-2	3	2	1	0	1

William & Mary

Player	Pos	Min	FG	3PT	FT	REB	AST	STL	BLK	PTS
Chase Lowe	G	33	5-10	0-0	7-8	8	4	2	0	17
Gabe Dorsey	Guard	29	4-8	4-8	4-5	3	0	0	0	16
Noah Collier	F	16	5-9	0-0	1-4	3	0	0	1	11
Jack Karasinski	F	27	4-13	1-6	0-0	4	1	1	0	9
Trey Moss	G	28	2-9	1-6	2-2	1	2	0	0	7
Caleb Dorsey	Forward	24	0-1	0-1	0-0	7	1	1	0	0
Tai Hamilton	F	13	0-0	0-0	0-0	4	1	0	0	0
Sean Houpt	Guard	11	0-3	0-3	0-0	0	0	0	0	0
Jayden Lemond	G	7	0-0	0-0	0-2	0	0	0	0	0
Charlie Williams	C	6	0-1	0-1	0-0	0	0	0	0	0
Miles Hicks	G	6	0-0	0-0	0-0	1	0	0	0	0

Advanced Game Stats

69.0Possessions69.0

102.9Offensive Efficiency87.0

87.0Defensive Efficiency102.9

15.9Net Efficiency-15.9

52.7%Effective FG%42.6%

55.4%True Shooting %46.9%

15.9%Turnover Rate20.3%

34.5%Free Throw Rate38.9%

38.2%3-Point Rate46.3%

0.91Assist / Turnover0.64

Game Summary

Lindenwood won by 11 points. The game played at approximately 69.0 possessions. The largest advanced-stat separations came in Net Efficiency, Offensive Efficiency, Defensive Efficiency.

Advanced game metrics are calculated by Mid-Major Hoops from team box-score totals. Possessions are estimated. Highlighted advanced values indicate the stronger result for that metric; lower is better for defensive efficiency and turnover rate.