Queens University logo

Queens University

21-14
GAME THAT MATTERSAT
51.8%Queens University
48.2%Drexel
MMH WIN PROBABILITY
MODEL SPREADDrexel -1.9
PROJECTED TOTAL153.6
MODEL MONEYLINEQueens University -107
Drexel logo

Drexel

17-16
MMH MODEL PROJECTION
Projected ScoreQueens University 76
Projected Total153.6
Projected ScoreDrexel 78

Team Comparison

51.7MMH Power Index46.5
118.4Offensive Efficiency103.6
117.0Defensive Efficiency102.4
1.4Net Efficiency1.2
0.1Strength of Schedule-0.4
1.5Last 10 Net Efficiency-4.7
71.4Tempo65.7
56.6%Effective FG%51.3%
14.8%Turnover Rate19.1%
29.6%Offensive Rebound %30.7%
37.6%Free Throw Rate32.3%
0.9Average Margin0.8
MMH GAME INTELLIGENCE
MODEL READ

Queens University HAS THE EDGE

WIN PROBABILITY51.8%
STATISTICAL ADVANTAGE
9–2
MMH comparison metrics
WHERE THE EDGE COMES FROMQueens University holds the advantage in MMH Power Index (51.7–46.5), offensive efficiency (118.4–103.6), net efficiency (1.4–1.2), strength of schedule (0.1–-0.4).
Drexel COUNTERS WITHdefensive efficiency (102.4–117.0), offensive rebounding (30.7–29.6).
Final
Queens University logo
Queens University
52—62
Drexel logo
Drexel
Drexel by 10 • 63.2 estimated possessions

Team Stats

Queens UniversityTEAM STATDrexel
19-58FG26-55
33.0%FG%47.0%
6-203PT2-16
30.0%3PT%13.0%
8-14FT8-14
57.0%FT%57.0%
34Rebounds39
13Offensive Rebounds10
9Assists10
11Turnovers12
4Steals4
—Blocks7
17Fouls13

Player Box Score

Queens University
PlayerPosMinFG3PTFTREBASTSTLBLKTOPFPTS
AJ McKeeGuard384-142-53-642100013
Deyton AlburyG325-130-13-674100013
BJ McLaurinForward323-113-72-271100011
Bryce CashGuard275-70-10-060000010
Kobe GeorgeGuard131-91-40-00000003
Chris AshbyG341-30-10-00200002
Jaxon PollardF110-10-10-02000000
Malcolm WilsonForward100-00-00-04010000
Logan ThreattG30-00-00-00000000
Drexel
PlayerPosMinFG3PTFTREBASTSTLBLKTOPFPTS
Garfield TurnerF256-70-01-250010013
Justin MooreG274-101-33-633200012
Lamar Oden Jr.Guard325-70-11-191010011
Kobe MaGeeG133-51-30-00002007
Amari WilliamsCenter103-70-01-27110007
Luke HouseGuard253-70-20-05101006
Yame ButlerG232-80-42-33110006
Mate OkrosForward230-10-10-03100000
Jamie BergensGuard170-30-20-01200000
Cole HargroveF50-00-00-01002000

Advanced Game Stats

63.2Possessions63.2
82.3Offensive Efficiency98.1
98.1Defensive Efficiency82.3
-15.8Net Efficiency15.8
37.9%Effective FG%49.1%
40.2%True Shooting %50.3%
17.6%Turnover Rate18.9%
24.1%Free Throw Rate25.5%
34.5%3-Point Rate29.1%
0.82Assist / Turnover0.83
Game Summary
Drexel won by 10 points. The game played at approximately 63.2 possessions. The largest advanced-stat separations came in Net Efficiency, Offensive Efficiency, Defensive Efficiency.

Advanced game metrics are calculated by Mid-Major Hoops from team box-score totals. Possessions are estimated. Highlighted advanced values indicate the stronger result for that metric; lower is better for defensive efficiency and turnover rate.