
Queens University
21-14GAME THAT MATTERSAT
51.8%Queens University
48.2%Drexel
MMH WIN PROBABILITY
MODEL SPREADDrexel -1.9
PROJECTED TOTAL153.6
MODEL MONEYLINEQueens University -107

Drexel
17-16MMH MODEL PROJECTION
Projected ScoreQueens University 76
Projected Total153.6
Projected ScoreDrexel 78
Team Comparison
51.7MMH Power Index46.5
118.4Offensive Efficiency103.6
117.0Defensive Efficiency102.4
1.4Net Efficiency1.2
0.1Strength of Schedule-0.4
1.5Last 10 Net Efficiency-4.7
71.4Tempo65.7
56.6%Effective FG%51.3%
14.8%Turnover Rate19.1%
29.6%Offensive Rebound %30.7%
37.6%Free Throw Rate32.3%
0.9Average Margin0.8
MMH GAME INTELLIGENCE
MODEL READ
Queens University HAS THE EDGE
WIN PROBABILITY51.8%
STATISTICAL ADVANTAGE
9–2
MMH comparison metrics
WHERE THE EDGE COMES FROMQueens University holds the advantage in MMH Power Index (51.7–46.5), offensive efficiency (118.4–103.6), net efficiency (1.4–1.2), strength of schedule (0.1–-0.4).
Drexel COUNTERS WITHdefensive efficiency (102.4–117.0), offensive rebounding (30.7–29.6).