
LSU
15-17GAME THAT MATTERSAT
29.2%LSU
70.8%Wake Forest
MMH WIN PROBABILITY
MODEL SPREADWake Forest -5.8
PROJECTED TOTAL161.8
MODEL MONEYLINEWake Forest -242

Wake Forest
18-17MMH MODEL PROJECTION
Projected ScoreLSU 78
Projected Total161.8
Projected ScoreWake Forest 84
Team Comparison
54.2MMH Power Index57.6
115.5Offensive Efficiency112.4
111.3Defensive Efficiency109.7
4.2Net Efficiency2.7
4.5Strength of Schedule7.2
-12.8Last 10 Net Efficiency-0.1
70.5Tempo70.2
53.4%Effective FG%52.8%
15.6%Turnover Rate15.5%
33.2%Offensive Rebound %30.0%
41.9%Free Throw Rate36.1%
2.9Average Margin1.9
MMH GAME INTELLIGENCE
MODEL READ
LSU HAS THE EDGE
WIN PROBABILITY70.8%
STATISTICAL ADVANTAGE
6–5
MMH comparison metrics
WHERE THE EDGE COMES FROMLSU holds the advantage in offensive efficiency (115.5–112.4), net efficiency (4.2–2.7), shooting efficiency (53.4–52.8), offensive rebounding (33.2–30.0).
Wake Forest COUNTERS WITHMMH Power Index (57.6–54.2), defensive efficiency (109.7–111.3), strength of schedule (7.2–4.5).