
Fordham
17-15GAME THAT MATTERSAT
26.9%Fordham
73.1%Kent State
MMH WIN PROBABILITY
MODEL SPREADKent State -6.5
PROJECTED TOTAL151.1
MODEL MONEYLINEKent State -272

Kent State
24-10MMH MODEL PROJECTION
Projected ScoreFordham 72
Projected Total151.1
Projected ScoreKent State 79
Team Comparison
50.3MMH Power Index54.7
105.9Offensive Efficiency113.9
99.3Defensive Efficiency107.6
6.6Net Efficiency6.3
-2.4Strength of Schedule-0.1
-0.9Last 10 Net Efficiency2.1
65.9Tempo74.0
50.0%Effective FG%53.0%
17.3%Turnover Rate17.7%
34.5%Offensive Rebound %35.0%
26.9%Free Throw Rate43.5%
4.4Average Margin4.7
MMH GAME INTELLIGENCE
MODEL READ
Kent State HAS THE EDGE
WIN PROBABILITY73.1%
STATISTICAL ADVANTAGE
8–3
MMH comparison metrics
WHERE THE EDGE COMES FROMKent State holds the advantage in MMH Power Index (54.7–50.3), offensive efficiency (113.9–105.9), strength of schedule (-0.1–-2.4), recent form (2.1–-0.9).
Fordham COUNTERS WITHdefensive efficiency (99.3–107.6), net efficiency (6.6–6.3), ball security (17.3–17.7).