Stonehill logo

Stonehill

12-21
GAME THAT MATTERSAT
36.2%Stonehill
63.8%East Texas A&M
MMH WIN PROBABILITY
MODEL SPREADEast Texas A&M -3.7
PROJECTED TOTAL139.3
MODEL MONEYLINEEast Texas A&M -176
East Texas A&M logo

East Texas A&M

11-21
MMH MODEL PROJECTION
Projected ScoreStonehill 68
Projected Total139.3
Projected ScoreEast Texas A&M 72

Team Comparison

37.9MMH Power Index38.4
97.5Offensive Efficiency101.2
100.7Defensive Efficiency107.5
-3.2Net Efficiency-6.3
-5.4Strength of Schedule-1.5
-3.4Last 10 Net Efficiency-9.1
68.1Tempo69.3
48.0%Effective FG%50.7%
19.1%Turnover Rate18.7%
28.4%Offensive Rebound %26.3%
29.2%Free Throw Rate31.9%
-2.2Average Margin-4.3
MMH GAME INTELLIGENCE
MODEL READ

East Texas A&M HAS THE EDGE

WIN PROBABILITY63.8%
STATISTICAL ADVANTAGE
6–5
MMH comparison metrics
WHERE THE EDGE COMES FROMEast Texas A&M holds the advantage in MMH Power Index (38.4–37.9), offensive efficiency (101.2–97.5), strength of schedule (-1.5–-5.4), shooting efficiency (50.7–48.0).
Stonehill COUNTERS WITHdefensive efficiency (100.7–107.5), net efficiency (-3.2–-6.3), recent form (-3.4–-9.1).
Final
Stonehill logo
Stonehill
86—97
East Texas A&M logo
East Texas A&M
East Texas A&M by 11 • 75.9 estimated possessions

Team Stats

StonehillTEAM STATEast Texas A&M
30-50FG31-59
60.0%FG%53.0%
7-173PT17-36
41.0%3PT%47.0%
19-24FT18-26
79.0%FT%69.0%
30Rebounds19
5Offensive Rebounds4
10Assists20
19Turnovers9
5Steals9
1Blocks4
22Fouls18

Player Box Score

Stonehill
PlayerPosMinFG3PTFTREBASTSTLBLKTOPFPTS
Tony FelderGuard378-134-74-634200024
Pano PavlidisForward247-92-21-161110017
Max ZegarowskiForward375-70-25-621000015
Jackson BenigniG374-100-45-661200013
Shane O'DellForward183-60-02-33200008
Todd BrognaF182-21-10-03100005
Louie Semona IIIF151-10-00-00000002
Chas StinsonG140-20-12-22000002
East Texas A&M
PlayerPosMinFG3PTFTREBASTSTLBLKTOPFPTS
Jerome Brewer Jr.F338-123-53-442100022
Kalen WilliamsGuard325-122-87-713300019
Evan PhelpsG236-105-82-232010019
Tommie LewisGuard355-75-61-251100016
Alonzo DoddG312-81-64-621021009
Zondrick GarrettForward132-40-11-20101005
KC UgwuakaziF82-20-00-10110004
Khaliq Abdul-MateenGuard91-21-20-21010003
Kwo AgwaF90-10-00-01000000
James WeathersG70-10-00-00001000

Advanced Game Stats

75.9Possessions75.9
113.3Offensive Efficiency127.8
127.8Defensive Efficiency113.3
-14.5Net Efficiency14.5
67.0%Effective FG%66.9%
70.0%True Shooting %68.0%
25.2%Turnover Rate11.8%
48.0%Free Throw Rate44.1%
34.0%3-Point Rate61.0%
0.53Assist / Turnover2.22
Game Summary
East Texas A&M won by 11 points. The game played at approximately 75.9 possessions. The largest advanced-stat separations came in Net Efficiency, Offensive Efficiency, Defensive Efficiency.

Advanced game metrics are calculated by Mid-Major Hoops from team box-score totals. Possessions are estimated. Highlighted advanced values indicate the stronger result for that metric; lower is better for defensive efficiency and turnover rate.