
UTEP
11-20GAME THAT MATTERSAT
13.5%UTEP
86.5%California
MMH WIN PROBABILITY
MODEL SPREADCalifornia -13.1
PROJECTED TOTAL147.7
MODEL MONEYLINECalifornia -641

California
22-12MMH MODEL PROJECTION
Projected ScoreUTEP 67
Projected Total147.7
Projected ScoreCalifornia 80
Team Comparison
44.4MMH Power Index56.5
102.6Offensive Efficiency111.8
107.1Defensive Efficiency104.8
-4.5Net Efficiency7.0
1.7Strength of Schedule2.8
-4.7Last 10 Net Efficiency1.8
67.6Tempo69.9
49.2%Effective FG%52.6%
17.3%Turnover Rate14.9%
27.6%Offensive Rebound %26.6%
35.6%Free Throw Rate36.8%
-3.1Average Margin4.9
MMH GAME INTELLIGENCE
MODEL READ
California HAS THE EDGE
WIN PROBABILITY86.5%
STATISTICAL ADVANTAGE
10–1
MMH comparison metrics
WHERE THE EDGE COMES FROMCalifornia holds the advantage in MMH Power Index (56.5–44.4), offensive efficiency (111.8–102.6), defensive efficiency (104.8–107.1), net efficiency (7.0–-4.5).
UTEP COUNTERS WITHoffensive rebounding (27.6–26.6).