Hofstra

24-11

GAME THAT MATTERSAT

43.4%Hofstra

56.6%Wright State

MMH WIN PROBABILITY

MODEL SPREADWright State -2.2

PROJECTED TOTAL149.8

MODEL MONEYLINEWright State -130

Wright State

23-12

MMH MODEL PROJECTION

Projected ScoreHofstra 74

Projected Total149.8

Projected ScoreWright State 76

Team Comparison

HofstraMetricWright State

59.3MMH Power Index57.1

114.0Offensive Efficiency116.4

100.9Defensive Efficiency106.5

13.1Net Efficiency9.9

-2.9Strength of Schedule-2.0

14.0Last 10 Net Efficiency7.0

66.2Tempo69.2

52.2%Effective FG%55.2%

16.1%Turnover Rate16.1%

35.0%Offensive Rebound %33.9%

32.0%Free Throw Rate38.3%

8.7Average Margin6.8

MMH GAME INTELLIGENCE

MODEL READ

Hofstra HAS THE EDGE

WIN PROBABILITY56.6%

STATISTICAL ADVANTAGE

6–4

MMH comparison metrics

WHERE THE EDGE COMES FROMHofstra holds the advantage in MMH Power Index (59.3–57.1), defensive efficiency (100.9–106.5), net efficiency (13.1–9.9), recent form (14.0–7.0).

Wright State COUNTERS WITHoffensive efficiency (116.4–114.0), strength of schedule (-2.0–-2.9), shooting efficiency (55.2–52.2).

Final

Hofstra

85—76

Wright State

Hofstra by 9 • 70.1 estimated possessions

Team Stats

HofstraTEAM STATWright State

29-59FG26-56

49.0%FG%46.0%

11-283PT9-18

39.0%3PT%50.0%

16-21FT15-17

76.0%FT%88.0%

32Rebounds31

8Offensive Rebounds7

15Assists12

9Turnovers13

8Steals5

3Blocks2

15Fouls19

Player Box Score

Hofstra

Player	Pos	Min	FG	3PT	FT	REB	AST	STL	BLK	PTS
Tyler Thomas	Not Available	40	9-19	4-8	8-8	4	4	2	0	30
Darlinstone Dubar	Guard	40	5-14	3-8	3-6	4	2	0	1	16
Jaquan Carlos	Guard	34	5-9	2-5	3-3	5	5	4	0	15
Jacco Fritz	Forward	35	6-7	0-0	2-4	9	2	1	1	14
Bryce Washington	Guard	26	3-7	1-5	0-0	5	1	0	1	7
KiJan Robinson	G	20	1-3	1-2	0-0	0	0	1	0	3
Silas Sunday	F	5	0-0	0-0	0-0	3	1	0	0	0

Wright State

Player	Pos	Min	FG	3PT	FT	REB	AST	STL	BLK	PTS
Brandon Noel	F	35	6-11	3-5	2-2	6	0	0	1	17
Tanner Holden	Guard	35	4-10	0-0	7-7	5	3	0	1	15
AJ Braun	Forward	18	5-7	0-0	2-4	4	0	0	0	12
Trey Calvin	Guard	36	3-14	3-7	2-2	4	3	1	0	11
Alex Huibregtse	G	19	4-6	2-4	0-0	2	2	1	0	10
Drey Carter	F	11	2-4	0-1	2-2	0	1	0	0	6
Andrew Welage	Guard	21	2-4	1-1	0-0	4	0	2	0	5
Logan Woods	G	21	0-0	0-0	0-0	3	2	1	0	0
Kaden Brown	G	4	0-0	0-0	0-0	0	1	0	0	0

Advanced Game Stats

70.1Possessions70.1

121.3Offensive Efficiency108.4

108.4Defensive Efficiency121.3

12.8Net Efficiency-12.8

58.5%Effective FG%54.5%

61.6%True Shooting %59.3%

12.9%Turnover Rate18.6%

35.6%Free Throw Rate30.4%

47.5%3-Point Rate32.1%

1.67Assist / Turnover0.92

Game Summary

Hofstra won by 9 points. The game played at approximately 70.1 possessions. The largest advanced-stat separations came in Net Efficiency, Offensive Efficiency, Defensive Efficiency.

Advanced game metrics are calculated by Mid-Major Hoops from team box-score totals. Possessions are estimated. Highlighted advanced values indicate the stronger result for that metric; lower is better for defensive efficiency and turnover rate.