Alabama A&M

18-15

GAME THAT MATTERSAT

4.9%Alabama A&M

95.1%Auburn

MMH WIN PROBABILITY

MODEL SPREADAuburn -18.2

PROJECTED TOTAL155.8

MODEL MONEYLINEAuburn -1941

Auburn

21-16

MMH MODEL PROJECTION

Projected ScoreAlabama A&M 69

Projected Total155.8

Projected ScoreAuburn 87

Team Comparison

Alabama A&MMetricAuburn

42.3MMH Power Index64.4

105.9Offensive Efficiency118.8

106.6Defensive Efficiency113.0

-0.7Net Efficiency5.8

-6.8Strength of Schedule7.5

3.3Last 10 Net Efficiency8.0

68.0Tempo69.8

49.7%Effective FG%53.1%

16.8%Turnover Rate14.5%

28.0%Offensive Rebound %36.5%

45.7%Free Throw Rate43.8%

-0.5Average Margin4.1

MMH GAME INTELLIGENCE

MODEL READ

Auburn HAS THE EDGE

WIN PROBABILITY95.1%

STATISTICAL ADVANTAGE

9–2

MMH comparison metrics

WHERE THE EDGE COMES FROMAuburn holds the advantage in MMH Power Index (64.4–42.3), offensive efficiency (118.8–105.9), net efficiency (5.8–-0.7), strength of schedule (7.5–-6.8).

Alabama A&M COUNTERS WITHdefensive efficiency (106.6–113.0), free throw rate (45.7–43.8).

Final

Alabama A&M

54—84

Auburn

Auburn by 30 • 72.6 estimated possessions

Team Stats

Alabama A&MTEAM STATAuburn

19-57FG26-55

33.0%FG%47.0%

3-153PT6-24

20.0%3PT%25.0%

13-17FT26-36

76.0%FT%72.0%

27Rebounds48

6Offensive Rebounds13

6Assists19

14Turnovers13

8Steals9

3Blocks6

26Fouls17

Player Box Score

Alabama A&M

Player	Pos	Min	FG	3PT	FT	REB	AST	STL	BLK	PTS
Chad Moodie	F	18	2-5	0-0	5-6	7	2	1	2	9
Eric Lee	Guard	11	4-7	0-0	0-0	2	0	1	0	8
Dailin Smith	G	19	3-8	0-1	1-1	1	0	0	1	7
AC Bryant	G	17	2-5	0-1	3-6	3	1	1	0	7
Dylan Mclean	Guard	14	2-5	1-3	2-2	1	0	0	0	7
Omari Peek	Guard	21	1-7	0-2	2-2	3	0	1	0	4
William Tavares	Center	13	1-1	1-1	0-0	3	0	1	0	3
London Riley	Guard	6	1-1	1-1	0-0	0	0	0	0	3
Jayland Randall	G	17	1-5	0-0	0-0	0	0	0	0	2
EJ Williams	Center	14	1-3	0-0	0-0	1	1	0	0	2
Joshua Hughley	Guard	2	1-1	0-0	0-0	0	0	0	0	2
Caleb Blackwell	G	22	0-4	0-3	0-0	1	1	2	0	0
Lorenzo Downey	Guard	19	0-4	0-2	0-0	2	1	1	0	0
Darius Osborne	Forward	7	0-1	0-1	0-0	1	0	0	0	0

Auburn

Player	Pos	Min	FG	3PT	FT	REB	AST	STL	BLK	PTS
Chaney Johnson	Forward	18	6-8	0-1	3-4	4	0	2	1	15
Aden Holloway	G	22	3-9	2-7	5-7	1	2	0	0	13
Johni Broome	Forward	21	3-7	0-2	4-6	5	2	1	0	10
Jaylin Williams	Forward	17	3-4	1-2	3-4	6	1	3	1	10
Denver Jones	Guard	17	3-6	1-4	1-1	2	0	1	0	8
Tre Donaldson	G	21	2-5	0-1	2-2	3	3	0	0	6
Chad Baker-Mazara	G	20	1-4	1-3	3-4	4	6	1	0	6
Dylan Cardwell	Center	17	3-5	0-0	0-0	9	2	1	1	6
K.D. Johnson	Guard	12	2-4	1-3	1-2	2	1	0	1	6
Addarin Scott	F	2	0-0	0-0	2-2	2	0	0	0	2
Blake Muschalek	G	2	0-2	0-0	2-2	0	0	0	0	2
Chris Moore	Forward	23	0-1	0-1	0-0	5	2	0	1	0
Lior Berman	Guard	6	0-0	0-0	0-2	1	0	0	1	0
Carter Sobera	Guard	2	0-0	0-0	0-0	1	0	0	0	0

Advanced Game Stats

72.6Possessions72.6

74.4Offensive Efficiency115.7

115.7Defensive Efficiency74.4

-41.3Net Efficiency41.3

36.0%Effective FG%52.7%

41.5%True Shooting %58.3%

19.2%Turnover Rate18.0%

29.8%Free Throw Rate65.5%

26.3%3-Point Rate43.6%

0.43Assist / Turnover1.46

Game Summary

Auburn won by 30 points. The game played at approximately 72.6 possessions. The largest advanced-stat separations came in Net Efficiency, Offensive Efficiency, Defensive Efficiency.

Advanced game metrics are calculated by Mid-Major Hoops from team box-score totals. Possessions are estimated. Highlighted advanced values indicate the stronger result for that metric; lower is better for defensive efficiency and turnover rate.