UC Irvine

23-12

GAME THAT MATTERSAT

85.1%UC Irvine

14.9%Pepperdine

MMH WIN PROBABILITY

MODEL SPREADUC Irvine -11.9

PROJECTED TOTAL150.7

MODEL MONEYLINEUC Irvine -571

Pepperdine

9-23

MMH MODEL PROJECTION

Projected ScoreUC Irvine 81

Projected Total150.7

Projected ScorePepperdine 69

Team Comparison

UC IrvineMetricPepperdine

58.4MMH Power Index38.2

106.9Offensive Efficiency103.2

95.0Defensive Efficiency113.6

11.9Net Efficiency-10.4

-1.0Strength of Schedule0.7

10.0Last 10 Net Efficiency-10.3

72.3Tempo70.0

50.7%Effective FG%48.7%

17.6%Turnover Rate18.3%

33.1%Offensive Rebound %31.1%

36.5%Free Throw Rate34.0%

8.6Average Margin-7.3

MMH GAME INTELLIGENCE

MODEL READ

UC Irvine HAS THE EDGE

WIN PROBABILITY85.1%

STATISTICAL ADVANTAGE

10–1

MMH comparison metrics

WHERE THE EDGE COMES FROMUC Irvine holds the advantage in MMH Power Index (58.4–38.2), offensive efficiency (106.9–103.2), defensive efficiency (95.0–113.6), net efficiency (11.9–-10.4).

Pepperdine COUNTERS WITHstrength of schedule (0.7–-1.0).

Final

UC Irvine

76—60

Pepperdine

UC Irvine by 16 • 66.5 estimated possessions

Team Stats

UC IrvineTEAM STATPepperdine

31-60FG22-51

52.0%FG%43.0%

6-133PT3-14

46.0%3PT%21.0%

8-17FT13-25

47.0%FT%52.0%

43Rebounds29

14Offensive Rebounds9

19Assists11

14Turnovers11

7Steals4

1Blocks3

20Fouls20

Player Box Score

UC Irvine

Player	Pos	Min	FG	3PT	FT	REB	AST	STL	BLK	PTS
Derin Saran	G	20	7-9	1-1	1-2	8	2	0	0	16
Andre Henry	G	19	4-6	1-1	1-2	5	1	0	0	10
Justin Hohn	Guard	24	4-9	1-3	0-0	3	0	1	0	9
Langston Redfield	G	24	3-6	2-3	0-0	1	3	1	0	8
Devin Tillis	F	20	2-4	0-2	3-4	6	5	1	0	7
Ofure Ujadughele	Guard	18	2-7	0-1	3-5	4	1	3	0	7
Pierre Crockrell II	Guard	19	3-7	0-0	0-1	2	3	0	0	6
Dean Keeler	Forward	14	2-4	0-0	0-2	4	3	1	0	4
Hayden Welling	F	12	2-3	0-0	0-0	1	0	0	0	4
Dylan Thoerner	Guard	12	1-2	1-2	0-0	1	0	0	0	3
Carter Welling	F	18	1-3	0-0	0-1	3	1	0	1	2

Pepperdine

Player	Pos	Min	FG	3PT	FT	REB	AST	STL	BLK	PTS
Michael Ajayi	F	35	7-12	0-1	2-2	11	3	0	0	16
Cord Stansberry	G	23	4-8	1-4	3-4	1	2	0	0	12
Houston Mallette	G	28	4-11	0-1	2-3	1	2	2	0	10
Malik Messina-Moore	G	28	2-6	1-4	1-2	1	2	0	0	6
Aladji Gassama	Center	22	2-2	0-0	1-6	2	1	1	2	5
Ethan Anderson	Guard	22	2-6	0-0	1-2	1	0	0	0	5
Jalen Pitre	F	14	1-2	1-2	1-2	2	0	1	1	4
Curtis Williams	Guard	12	0-1	0-1	2-4	2	0	0	0	2
Nils Cooper	G	12	0-2	0-0	0-0	5	0	0	0	0
John Squire	F	4	0-1	0-1	0-0	0	1	0	0	0

Advanced Game Stats

66.5Possessions66.5

114.3Offensive Efficiency90.2

90.2Defensive Efficiency114.3

24.1Net Efficiency-24.1

56.7%Effective FG%46.1%

55.8%True Shooting %47.7%

20.6%Turnover Rate17.0%

28.3%Free Throw Rate49.0%

21.7%3-Point Rate27.5%

1.36Assist / Turnover1.00

Game Summary

UC Irvine won by 16 points. The game played at approximately 66.5 possessions. The largest advanced-stat separations came in Net Efficiency, Offensive Efficiency, Defensive Efficiency.

Advanced game metrics are calculated by Mid-Major Hoops from team box-score totals. Possessions are estimated. Highlighted advanced values indicate the stronger result for that metric; lower is better for defensive efficiency and turnover rate.