Green Bay

18-15

GAME THAT MATTERSAT

63.7%Green Bay

36.3%UC Riverside

MMH WIN PROBABILITY

MODEL SPREADGreen Bay -2.2

PROJECTED TOTAL152.6

MODEL MONEYLINEGreen Bay -175

UC Riverside

10-22

MMH MODEL PROJECTION

Projected ScoreGreen Bay 77

Projected Total152.6

Projected ScoreUC Riverside 75

Team Comparison

Green BayMetricUC Riverside

50.8MMH Power Index41.2

114.0Offensive Efficiency103.1

114.0Defensive Efficiency110.1

0.0Net Efficiency-7.0

0.7Strength of Schedule0.5

5.1Last 10 Net Efficiency-5.1

65.7Tempo70.7

55.4%Effective FG%49.8%

15.9%Turnover Rate18.5%

25.6%Offensive Rebound %28.5%

42.4%Free Throw Rate35.2%

0.0Average Margin-4.9

MMH GAME INTELLIGENCE

MODEL READ

Green Bay HAS THE EDGE

WIN PROBABILITY63.7%

STATISTICAL ADVANTAGE

9–2

MMH comparison metrics

WHERE THE EDGE COMES FROMGreen Bay holds the advantage in MMH Power Index (50.8–41.2), offensive efficiency (114.0–103.1), net efficiency (0.0–-7.0), strength of schedule (0.7–0.5).

UC Riverside COUNTERS WITHdefensive efficiency (110.1–114.0), offensive rebounding (28.5–25.6).

Final

Green Bay

68—74

UC Riverside

UC Riverside by 6 • 63.8 estimated possessions

Team Stats

Green BayTEAM STATUC Riverside

25-52FG28-60

48.0%FG%47.0%

13-243PT8-23

54.0%3PT%35.0%

5-8FT10-12

63.0%FT%83.0%

31Rebounds32

5Offensive Rebounds7

16Assists14

13Turnovers5

3Steals7

2Blocks1

11Fouls13

Player Box Score

Green Bay

Player	Pos	Min	FG	3PT	FT	REB	AST	STL	BLK	PTS
Noah Reynolds	Guard	37	8-14	1-2	2-3	2	8	0	0	19
Rich Byhre	Forward	22	5-8	4-7	0-0	3	2	0	0	14
David Douglas Jr.	G	25	4-6	4-6	0-0	3	0	0	0	12
Marcus Hall	F	24	4-7	3-4	1-2	1	1	1	0	12
Elijah Jones	F	24	1-5	0-1	2-3	6	1	0	1	4
Amari Jedkins	F	18	2-5	0-0	0-0	2	0	0	0	4
Preston Ruedinger	G	26	1-4	1-3	0-0	4	3	2	0	3
Will Eames	Forward	13	0-3	0-1	0-0	4	1	0	1	0
Ryan Wade	Guard	11	0-0	0-0	0-0	1	0	0	0	0

UC Riverside

Player	Pos	Min	FG	3PT	FT	REB	AST	STL	BLK	PTS
Isaiah Moses	G	32	7-14	2-5	6-6	2	6	2	0	22
Vlad Salaridze	F	22	7-9	0-1	0-0	3	1	2	1	14
Barrington Hargress	G	27	4-8	1-3	0-0	1	4	1	0	9
Benjamin Griscti	Not Available	24	2-6	2-4	2-4	6	2	0	0	8
Kyle Owens	Forward	16	2-5	0-0	2-2	7	1	1	0	6
Kaleb Smith	F	5	2-3	2-2	0-0	1	0	0	0	6
Wil Tattersall	Forward	26	2-5	1-4	0-0	5	0	0	0	5
Jhaylon Martinez	Center	16	1-4	0-1	0-0	2	0	0	0	2
Nate Pickens	G	12	1-3	0-0	0-0	1	0	1	0	2
Luke Turner	Forward	11	0-3	0-3	0-0	0	0	0	0	0
Niyi Olabode	Guard	9	0-0	0-0	0-0	2	0	0	0	0

Advanced Game Stats

63.8Possessions63.8

106.6Offensive Efficiency116.0

116.0Defensive Efficiency106.6

-9.4Net Efficiency9.4

60.6%Effective FG%53.3%

60.9%True Shooting %56.3%

20.4%Turnover Rate7.8%

15.4%Free Throw Rate20.0%

46.2%3-Point Rate38.3%

1.23Assist / Turnover2.80

Game Summary

UC Riverside won by 6 points. The game played at approximately 63.8 possessions. The largest advanced-stat separations came in Net Efficiency, Turnover Rate, Offensive Efficiency.

Advanced game metrics are calculated by Mid-Major Hoops from team box-score totals. Possessions are estimated. Highlighted advanced values indicate the stronger result for that metric; lower is better for defensive efficiency and turnover rate.