Georgia Tech

11-20

GAME THAT MATTERSAT

6.6%Georgia Tech

93.4%Cincinnati

MMH WIN PROBABILITY

MODEL SPREADCincinnati -17.3

PROJECTED TOTAL146.9

MODEL MONEYLINECincinnati -1415

Cincinnati

18-15

MMH MODEL PROJECTION

Projected ScoreGeorgia Tech 65

Projected Total146.9

Projected ScoreCincinnati 82

Team Comparison

Georgia TechMetricCincinnati

42.3MMH Power Index61.5

102.6Offensive Efficiency105.3

107.7Defensive Efficiency97.3

-5.1Net Efficiency8.0

3.8Strength of Schedule5.1

-19.7Last 10 Net Efficiency14.4

71.9Tempo69.4

50.3%Effective FG%50.6%

18.6%Turnover Rate17.0%

30.0%Offensive Rebound %30.6%

34.2%Free Throw Rate30.7%

-3.6Average Margin5.5

MMH GAME INTELLIGENCE

MODEL READ

Cincinnati HAS THE EDGE

WIN PROBABILITY93.4%

STATISTICAL ADVANTAGE

10–1

MMH comparison metrics

WHERE THE EDGE COMES FROMCincinnati holds the advantage in MMH Power Index (61.5–42.3), offensive efficiency (105.3–102.6), defensive efficiency (97.3–107.7), net efficiency (8.0–-5.1).

Georgia Tech COUNTERS WITHfree throw rate (34.2–30.7).

Final

Georgia Tech

54—89

Cincinnati

Cincinnati by 35 • 70.7 estimated possessions

Team Stats

Georgia TechTEAM STATCincinnati

17-49FG29-62

35.0%FG%47.0%

5-173PT14-35

29.0%3PT%40.0%

15-19FT17-24

79.0%FT%71.0%

32Rebounds34

7Offensive Rebounds8

8Assists17

19Turnovers6

4Steals7

10Blocks4

16Fouls15

Player Box Score

Georgia Tech

Player	Pos	Min	FG	3PT	FT	REB	AST	STL	BLK	PTS
Kowacie Reeves Jr.	F	29	4-6	1-2	5-5	3	1	1	3	14
Miles Kelly	Guard	25	3-10	0-3	6-7	2	1	1	0	12
Baye Ndongo	F	24	3-7	0-0	2-5	8	0	1	3	8
Naithan George	G	15	3-6	2-3	0-0	1	0	0	0	8
Ibrahima Sacko	F	24	1-3	1-3	0-0	3	0	0	0	3
Carter Murphy	Guard	14	1-4	1-4	0-0	4	0	0	2	3
Amaree Abram	G	13	1-6	0-0	0-0	4	1	0	0	2
Kyle Sturdivant	Guard	12	0-3	0-0	2-2	1	4	0	0	2
Ty Claude	Forward	11	1-2	0-0	0-0	2	0	0	1	2
Ebenezer Dowuona	Forward	18	0-0	0-0	0-0	0	1	0	1	0
Dallan Coleman	Guard	13	0-2	0-2	0-0	1	0	1	0	0
Emmer Nichols	Forward	2	0-0	0-0	0-0	1	0	0	0	0

Cincinnati

Player	Pos	Min	FG	3PT	FT	REB	AST	STL	BLK	PTS
Viktor Lakhin	Center	22	5-6	5-6	0-0	6	1	1	2	15
John Newman III	Forward	21	4-8	1-4	3-4	3	0	0	0	12
CJ Fredrick Jr.	Guard	20	3-6	3-5	2-3	2	1	0	0	11
Day Day Thomas	G	23	4-11	1-7	0-0	0	4	2	1	9
Aziz Bandaogo	Forward	21	3-4	0-0	2-3	9	1	0	1	8
Simas Lukosius	Guard	16	3-5	2-3	0-0	1	4	0	0	8
Jizzle James	G	15	3-6	1-3	1-2	1	3	1	0	8
Dan Skillings Jr.	G	21	2-7	0-2	2-2	3	1	1	0	6
Ody Oguama	Forward	18	1-1	0-0	4-6	4	1	2	0	6
Josh Reed	F	12	1-3	1-2	0-0	1	0	0	0	3
CJ Anthony	G	7	0-3	0-3	3-4	2	1	0	0	3
Chase Kirkwood	Guard	2	0-1	0-0	0-0	0	0	0	0	0
Landen Long	Guard	2	0-1	0-0	0-0	0	0	0	0	0

Advanced Game Stats

70.7Possessions70.7

76.4Offensive Efficiency125.9

125.9Defensive Efficiency76.4

-49.5Net Efficiency49.5

39.8%Effective FG%58.1%

46.5%True Shooting %60.6%

27.1%Turnover Rate8.4%

38.8%Free Throw Rate38.7%

34.7%3-Point Rate56.5%

0.42Assist / Turnover2.83

Game Summary

Cincinnati won by 35 points. The game played at approximately 70.7 possessions. The largest advanced-stat separations came in Net Efficiency, Offensive Efficiency, Defensive Efficiency.

Advanced game metrics are calculated by Mid-Major Hoops from team box-score totals. Possessions are estimated. Highlighted advanced values indicate the stronger result for that metric; lower is better for defensive efficiency and turnover rate.