
Fairleigh Dickinson
11-21GAME THAT MATTERSAT
11.9%Fairleigh Dickinson
88.1%Queens University
MMH WIN PROBABILITY
MODEL SPREADQueens University -12.3
PROJECTED TOTAL154.9
MODEL MONEYLINEQueens University -740

Queens University
21-14MMH MODEL PROJECTION
Projected ScoreFairleigh Dickinson 71
Projected Total154.9
Projected ScoreQueens University 84
Team Comparison
38.3MMH Power Index51.7
103.8Offensive Efficiency118.4
108.4Defensive Efficiency117.0
-4.6Net Efficiency1.4
-5.8Strength of Schedule0.1
-4.7Last 10 Net Efficiency1.5
64.7Tempo71.4
48.6%Effective FG%56.6%
18.2%Turnover Rate14.8%
33.6%Offensive Rebound %29.6%
33.1%Free Throw Rate37.6%
-3.0Average Margin0.9
MMH GAME INTELLIGENCE
MODEL READ
Queens University HAS THE EDGE
WIN PROBABILITY88.1%
STATISTICAL ADVANTAGE
9–2
MMH comparison metrics
WHERE THE EDGE COMES FROMQueens University holds the advantage in MMH Power Index (51.7–38.3), offensive efficiency (118.4–103.8), net efficiency (1.4–-4.6), strength of schedule (0.1–-5.8).
Fairleigh Dickinson COUNTERS WITHdefensive efficiency (108.4–117.0), offensive rebounding (33.6–29.6).