Hofstra

24-11

GAME THAT MATTERSAT

16.9%Hofstra

83.1%High Point

MMH WIN PROBABILITY

MODEL SPREADHigh Point -12.3

PROJECTED TOTAL153.8

MODEL MONEYLINEHigh Point -492

High Point

31-5

MMH MODEL PROJECTION

Projected ScoreHofstra 71

Projected Total153.8

Projected ScoreHigh Point 83

Team Comparison

HofstraMetricHigh Point

59.3MMH Power Index69

114.0Offensive Efficiency123.8

100.9Defensive Efficiency98.3

13.1Net Efficiency25.5

-2.9Strength of Schedule-5.8

14.0Last 10 Net Efficiency16.5

66.2Tempo72.4

52.2%Effective FG%56.6%

16.1%Turnover Rate12.8%

35.0%Offensive Rebound %33.2%

32.0%Free Throw Rate42.4%

8.7Average Margin18.5

MMH GAME INTELLIGENCE

MODEL READ

High Point HAS THE EDGE

WIN PROBABILITY83.1%

STATISTICAL ADVANTAGE

9–2

MMH comparison metrics

WHERE THE EDGE COMES FROMHigh Point holds the advantage in MMH Power Index (69.0–59.3), offensive efficiency (123.8–114.0), defensive efficiency (98.3–100.9), net efficiency (25.5–13.1).

Hofstra COUNTERS WITHstrength of schedule (-2.9–-5.8), offensive rebounding (35.0–33.2).

Final

Hofstra

97—92

High Point

Hofstra by 5 • 78.4 estimated possessions

Team Stats

HofstraTEAM STATHigh Point

31-62FG27-73

50.0%FG%37.0%

10-273PT8-28

37.0%3PT%29.0%

25-30FT30-43

83.0%FT%70.0%

38Rebounds50

6Offensive Rebounds21

15Assists9

9Turnovers5

2Steals3

6Blocks2

31Fouls22

Player Box Score

Hofstra

Player	Pos	Min	FG	3PT	FT	REB	AST	STL	BLK	PTS
Tyler Thomas	Not Available	45	12-26	6-14	10-10	8	5	1	2	40
Jaquan Carlos	Guard	45	5-13	2-5	6-6	7	8	1	0	18
Darlinstone Dubar	Guard	32	4-7	1-2	3-4	6	0	0	1	12
German Plotnikov	G	27	2-3	1-2	3-4	4	1	0	1	8
Bryce Washington	Guard	41	3-7	0-4	1-2	3	1	0	0	7
Silas Sunday	F	16	3-4	0-0	0-0	0	0	0	1	6
Jacco Fritz	Forward	10	2-2	0-0	2-4	2	0	0	1	6
KiJan Robinson	G	4	0-0	0-0	0-0	0	0	0	0	0
Christian Tomasco	Forward	3	0-0	0-0	0-0	1	0	0	0	0
Khalil Farmer	G	2	0-0	0-0	0-0	0	0	0	0	0

High Point

Player	Pos	Min	FG	3PT	FT	REB	AST	STL	BLK	PTS
Duke Miles	G	41	13-18	3-5	3-3	2	4	0	0	32
Kezza Giffa	G	34	3-10	2-6	11-12	0	3	1	0	19
Abdoulaye Thiam	Guard	31	5-13	2-6	3-6	5	1	1	0	15
Kimani Hamilton	F	31	3-13	0-0	2-4	10	1	1	0	8
Denzel Hines	F	21	0-3	0-1	6-10	8	0	0	0	6
Trae Benham	Guard	32	0-6	0-5	5-5	11	0	0	1	5
Juslin Bodo Bodo	C	21	2-4	0-0	0-3	6	0	0	0	4
Bryson Childress	Guard	3	1-1	1-1	0-0	1	0	0	0	3
Cade Potter	Forward	8	0-4	0-4	0-0	1	0	0	1	0
Titas Sargiunas	F	3	0-1	0-0	0-0	1	0	0	0	0

Advanced Game Stats

78.4Possessions78.4

123.7Offensive Efficiency117.3

117.3Defensive Efficiency123.7

6.4Net Efficiency-6.4

58.1%Effective FG%42.5%

63.6%True Shooting %49.2%

11.4%Turnover Rate6.5%

48.4%Free Throw Rate58.9%

43.5%3-Point Rate38.4%

1.67Assist / Turnover1.80

Game Summary

Hofstra won by 5 points. The game played at approximately 78.4 possessions. The largest advanced-stat separations came in Effective FG%, True Shooting %, Net Efficiency.

Advanced game metrics are calculated by Mid-Major Hoops from team box-score totals. Possessions are estimated. Highlighted advanced values indicate the stronger result for that metric; lower is better for defensive efficiency and turnover rate.