California

22-12

GAME THAT MATTERSAT

70.1%California

29.9%Tulane

MMH WIN PROBABILITY

MODEL SPREADCalifornia -5.1

PROJECTED TOTAL151.5

MODEL MONEYLINECalifornia -234

Tulane

18-15

MMH MODEL PROJECTION

Projected ScoreCalifornia 78

Projected Total151.5

Projected ScoreTulane 73

Team Comparison

CaliforniaMetricTulane

56.5MMH Power Index44.3

111.8Offensive Efficiency105.3

104.8Defensive Efficiency109.9

7.0Net Efficiency-4.6

2.8Strength of Schedule2.7

1.8Last 10 Net Efficiency-10.3

69.9Tempo68.7

52.6%Effective FG%49.6%

14.9%Turnover Rate15.6%

26.6%Offensive Rebound %22.8%

36.8%Free Throw Rate44.8%

4.9Average Margin-3.2

MMH GAME INTELLIGENCE

MODEL READ

California HAS THE EDGE

WIN PROBABILITY70.1%

STATISTICAL ADVANTAGE

10–1

MMH comparison metrics

WHERE THE EDGE COMES FROMCalifornia holds the advantage in MMH Power Index (56.5–44.3), offensive efficiency (111.8–105.3), defensive efficiency (104.8–109.9), net efficiency (7.0–-4.6).

Tulane COUNTERS WITHfree throw rate (44.8–36.8).

Final

California

81—84

Tulane

Tulane by 3 • 78.5 estimated possessions

Team Stats

CaliforniaTEAM STATTulane

28-61FG32-62

46.0%FG%52.0%

10-273PT6-19

37.0%3PT%32.0%

15-19FT14-19

79.0%FT%74.0%

37Rebounds25

10Offensive Rebounds5

10Assists7

20Turnovers11

6Steals10

1Blocks4

19Fouls17

Player Box Score

California

Player	Pos	Min	FG	3PT	FT	REB	AST	STL	BLK	PTS
Jaylon Tyson	Forward	36	7-12	5-7	5-8	9	5	3	0	24
Fardaws Aimaq	Forward	33	9-14	1-3	4-4	14	1	1	1	23
Jalen Cone	Guard	40	6-16	2-10	4-5	5	1	1	0	18
Gus Larson	F	16	2-4	1-2	2-2	1	1	1	0	7
Grant Newell	F	24	2-5	1-2	0-0	2	0	0	0	5
Rodney Brown Jr.	G	23	1-4	0-2	0-0	1	0	0	0	2
ND Okafor	C	7	1-5	0-0	0-0	1	1	0	0	2
Monty Bowser	G	12	0-0	0-0	0-0	2	0	0	0	0
Vladimir Pavlovic	G	9	0-1	0-1	0-0	0	1	0	0	0

Tulane

Player	Pos	Min	FG	3PT	FT	REB	AST	STL	BLK	PTS
Kevin Cross, Jr.	Forward	32	8-14	1-3	7-9	9	2	1	1	24
Sion James	Guard	37	6-7	4-4	2-2	2	0	0	0	18
Jaylen Forbes	Guard	28	4-14	1-7	3-3	2	1	1	0	12
Kolby King	G	33	4-8	0-2	1-1	6	2	3	0	9
Tre' Williams	Guard	22	3-6	0-1	1-2	1	1	2	0	7
Gregg Glenn III	F	25	3-5	0-0	0-0	3	1	2	0	6
Percy Daniels	C	10	3-4	0-1	0-2	0	0	1	3	6
Collin Holloway	Forward	13	1-4	0-1	0-0	2	0	0	0	2

Advanced Game Stats

78.5Possessions78.5

103.2Offensive Efficiency107.0

107.0Defensive Efficiency103.2

-3.8Net Efficiency3.8

54.1%Effective FG%56.5%

57.8%True Shooting %59.1%

25.0%Turnover Rate14.3%

31.1%Free Throw Rate30.6%

44.3%3-Point Rate30.6%

0.50Assist / Turnover0.64

Game Summary

Tulane won by 3 points. The game played at approximately 78.5 possessions. The largest advanced-stat separations came in Turnover Rate, Net Efficiency, Offensive Efficiency.

Advanced game metrics are calculated by Mid-Major Hoops from team box-score totals. Possessions are estimated. Highlighted advanced values indicate the stronger result for that metric; lower is better for defensive efficiency and turnover rate.