Lipscomb

18-13

GAME THAT MATTERSAT

39.4%Lipscomb

60.6%UNC Asheville

MMH WIN PROBABILITY

MODEL SPREADUNC Asheville -3.3

PROJECTED TOTAL150.1

MODEL MONEYLINEUNC Asheville -154

UNC Asheville

15-17

MMH MODEL PROJECTION

Projected ScoreLipscomb 73

Projected Total150.1

Projected ScoreUNC Asheville 77

Team Comparison

LipscombMetricUNC Asheville

47.9MMH Power Index47.2

111.3Offensive Efficiency107.5

107.6Defensive Efficiency106.8

3.7Net Efficiency0.7

-2.5Strength of Schedule-0.5

-1.0Last 10 Net Efficiency-5.5

68.8Tempo68.3

54.8%Effective FG%52.0%

16.0%Turnover Rate17.7%

25.9%Offensive Rebound %30.9%

26.5%Free Throw Rate40.2%

2.5Average Margin0.5

MMH GAME INTELLIGENCE

MODEL READ

Lipscomb HAS THE EDGE

WIN PROBABILITY60.6%

STATISTICAL ADVANTAGE

7–4

MMH comparison metrics

WHERE THE EDGE COMES FROMLipscomb holds the advantage in MMH Power Index (47.9–47.2), offensive efficiency (111.3–107.5), net efficiency (3.7–0.7), recent form (-1.0–-5.5).

UNC Asheville COUNTERS WITHdefensive efficiency (106.8–107.6), strength of schedule (-0.5–-2.5), offensive rebounding (30.9–25.9).

Final

Lipscomb

86—75

UNC Asheville

Lipscomb by 11 • 75.6 estimated possessions

Team Stats

LipscombTEAM STATUNC Asheville

29-59FG27-73

49.0%FG%37.0%

3-143PT3-23

21.0%3PT%13.0%

25-29FT18-24

86.0%FT%75.0%

40Rebounds39

14Offensive Rebounds22

10Assists9

16Turnovers14

5Steals5

3Blocks3

18Fouls23

Player Box Score

Lipscomb

Player	Pos	Min	FG	3PT	FT	REB	AST	STL	BLK	PTS
Will Pruitt	Guard	33	6-11	0-0	7-8	6	3	2	0	19
Derrin Boyd	Guard	28	4-11	1-2	9-10	6	1	1	0	18
Owen McCormack	Center	27	8-13	0-3	2-2	10	1	1	0	18
AJ McGinnis	Guard	32	5-10	0-4	1-2	1	1	0	0	11
Dylan Faulkner	F	11	3-4	0-0	4-5	3	0	0	2	10
TJ Johnson	F	15	2-4	2-4	0-0	2	0	0	0	6
Joe Anderson	Guard	33	0-3	0-1	2-2	5	4	1	1	2
Cody Head	G	10	1-1	0-0	0-0	2	0	0	0	2
Rylan Houck	Forward	9	0-2	0-0	0-0	0	0	0	0	0
Grant Asman	F	2	0-0	0-0	0-0	0	0	0	0	0

UNC Asheville

Player	Pos	Min	FG	3PT	FT	REB	AST	STL	BLK	PTS
Drew Pember	Forward	26	10-16	1-4	7-9	5	1	1	2	28
Josh Banks	Guard	32	7-25	1-11	5-5	8	0	1	1	20
Jamon Battle	Forward	33	4-5	0-1	3-4	7	0	2	0	11
Caleb Burgess	Guard	30	3-9	0-1	0-0	6	6	1	0	6
Fletcher Abee	Guard	21	1-4	1-2	0-0	0	1	0	0	3
Nick McMullen	Forward	18	1-7	0-0	1-4	6	1	0	0	3
Davion Cunningham	G	18	1-3	0-1	0-0	2	0	0	0	2
Trent Stephney	Guard	10	0-0	0-0	2-2	2	0	0	0	2
Evan Johnson	Guard	12	0-4	0-3	0-0	0	0	0	0	0

Advanced Game Stats

75.6Possessions75.6

113.8Offensive Efficiency99.2

99.2Defensive Efficiency113.8

14.6Net Efficiency-14.6

51.7%Effective FG%39.0%

59.1%True Shooting %44.4%

21.4%Turnover Rate18.3%

49.2%Free Throw Rate32.9%

23.7%3-Point Rate31.5%

0.63Assist / Turnover0.64

Game Summary

Lipscomb won by 11 points. The game played at approximately 75.6 possessions. The largest advanced-stat separations came in Net Efficiency, Free Throw Rate, True Shooting %.

Advanced game metrics are calculated by Mid-Major Hoops from team box-score totals. Possessions are estimated. Highlighted advanced values indicate the stronger result for that metric; lower is better for defensive efficiency and turnover rate.