
UIC
19-16GAME THAT MATTERSAT
49.0%UIC
51.0%Middle Tennessee
MMH WIN PROBABILITY
MODEL SPREADMiddle Tennessee -1.1
PROJECTED TOTAL148.4
MODEL MONEYLINEMiddle Tennessee -104

Middle Tennessee
17-15MMH MODEL PROJECTION
Projected ScoreUIC 74
Projected Total148.4
Projected ScoreMiddle Tennessee 75
Team Comparison
56.7MMH Power Index52.5
110.5Offensive Efficiency109.6
103.3Defensive Efficiency105.7
7.2Net Efficiency3.9
0.1Strength of Schedule0.4
9.2Last 10 Net Efficiency3.2
68.3Tempo68.8
50.9%Effective FG%52.2%
17.6%Turnover Rate16.7%
36.8%Offensive Rebound %31.3%
37.2%Free Throw Rate33.2%
4.9Average Margin2.7
MMH GAME INTELLIGENCE
MODEL READ
UIC HAS THE EDGE
WIN PROBABILITY51.0%
STATISTICAL ADVANTAGE
8–3
MMH comparison metrics
WHERE THE EDGE COMES FROMUIC holds the advantage in MMH Power Index (56.7–52.5), offensive efficiency (110.5–109.6), defensive efficiency (103.3–105.7), net efficiency (7.2–3.9).
Middle Tennessee COUNTERS WITHstrength of schedule (0.4–0.1), shooting efficiency (52.2–50.9), ball security (16.7–17.6).