Army

11-21

GAME THAT MATTERSAT

49.5%Army

50.5%Binghamton

MMH WIN PROBABILITY

MODEL SPREADBinghamton -1.0

PROJECTED TOTAL144.0

MODEL MONEYLINEBinghamton -102

Binghamton

8-22

MMH MODEL PROJECTION

Projected ScoreArmy 72

Projected Total144.0

Projected ScoreBinghamton 72

Team Comparison

ArmyMetricBinghamton

36.8MMH Power Index32.4

104.8Offensive Efficiency102.2

112.1Defensive Efficiency112.3

-7.3Net Efficiency-10.1

-3.3Strength of Schedule-6.0

-10.6Last 10 Net Efficiency-6.2

68.9Tempo64.2

49.8%Effective FG%51.3%

17.3%Turnover Rate18.5%

31.0%Offensive Rebound %21.5%

26.5%Free Throw Rate42.8%

-5.1Average Margin-6.5

MMH GAME INTELLIGENCE

MODEL READ

Army HAS THE EDGE

WIN PROBABILITY50.5%

STATISTICAL ADVANTAGE

8–3

MMH comparison metrics

WHERE THE EDGE COMES FROMArmy holds the advantage in MMH Power Index (36.8–32.4), offensive efficiency (104.8–102.2), defensive efficiency (112.1–112.3), net efficiency (-7.3–-10.1).

Binghamton COUNTERS WITHrecent form (-6.2–-10.6), shooting efficiency (51.3–49.8), free throw rate (42.8–26.5).

Final

Army

68—75

Binghamton

Binghamton by 7 • 71.0 estimated possessions

Team Stats

ArmyTEAM STATBinghamton

24-60FG23-48

40.0%FG%48.0%

10-313PT5-16

32.0%3PT%31.0%

10-23FT24-36

43.0%FT%67.0%

36Rebounds39

13Offensive Rebounds8

12Assists13

14Turnovers13

5Steals8

3Blocks4

27Fouls22

Player Box Score

Army

Player	Pos	Min	FG	3PT	FT	REB	AST	STL	BLK	PTS
Ryan Curry	G	26	4-12	2-7	3-4	1	2	1	0	13
Josh Scovens	F	29	5-9	2-3	0-0	4	1	0	0	12
Charlie Peterson	Forward	24	4-8	0-1	3-8	10	3	0	0	11
Kwabena Davis	Guard	22	4-9	2-5	0-0	2	1	1	0	10
Blake Barker	Guard	33	3-8	2-6	0-0	4	1	0	0	8
Dylan Blair	G	14	2-7	1-6	2-4	1	0	0	0	7
TJ Small	Guard	18	1-3	1-3	0-0	1	0	1	0	3
Abe Johnson	Forward	12	1-1	0-0	0-3	3	4	2	0	2
Jared Cross	Guard	7	0-1	0-0	2-4	1	0	0	0	2
AJ Allenspach	Forward	11	0-1	0-0	0-0	1	0	0	1	0
Matt Dove	Forward	4	0-1	0-0	0-0	0	0	0	2	0

Binghamton

Player	Pos	Min	FG	3PT	FT	REB	AST	STL	BLK	PTS
Tymu Chenery	Guard	38	6-15	0-5	11-14	4	3	1	2	23
Symir Torrence	Guard	34	7-9	3-3	3-6	8	6	2	0	20
Nehemiah Benson	Forward	16	3-4	1-1	3-4	4	0	0	1	10
Tariq Balogun	Forward	21	3-3	0-0	2-4	4	1	0	0	8
Armon Harried	Guard	33	2-3	0-0	2-4	5	3	2	0	6
Gavin Walsh	F	23	1-4	1-2	2-2	7	0	2	1	5
Evan Ashe	G	21	1-6	0-2	0-0	3	0	1	0	2
Chris Walker	G	11	0-4	0-3	1-2	1	0	0	0	1
Taveion White	Forward	3	0-0	0-0	0-0	1	0	0	0	0

Advanced Game Stats

71.0Possessions71.0

95.8Offensive Efficiency105.6

105.6Defensive Efficiency95.8

-9.9Net Efficiency9.9

48.3%Effective FG%53.1%

47.9%True Shooting %57.6%

19.5%Turnover Rate18.5%

38.3%Free Throw Rate75.0%

51.7%3-Point Rate33.3%

0.86Assist / Turnover1.00

Game Summary

Binghamton won by 7 points. The game played at approximately 71.0 possessions. The largest advanced-stat separations came in Free Throw Rate, Net Efficiency, Offensive Efficiency.

Advanced game metrics are calculated by Mid-Major Hoops from team box-score totals. Possessions are estimated. Highlighted advanced values indicate the stronger result for that metric; lower is better for defensive efficiency and turnover rate.