UT Martin logo

UT Martin

22-11
GAME THAT MATTERSAT
73.4%UT Martin
26.6%Chicago State
MMH WIN PROBABILITY
MODEL SPREADUT Martin -8.4
PROJECTED TOTAL136.4
MODEL MONEYLINEUT Martin -276
Chicago State logo

Chicago State

7-25
MMH MODEL PROJECTION
Projected ScoreUT Martin 72
Projected Total136.4
Projected ScoreChicago State 64

Team Comparison

49.8MMH Power Index36.1
103.8Offensive Efficiency99.4
94.0Defensive Efficiency114.9
9.8Net Efficiency-15.5
-4.8Strength of Schedule0.5
-0.8Last 10 Net Efficiency-4.3
67.2Tempo66.2
49.5%Effective FG%45.6%
21.4%Turnover Rate15.8%
37.9%Offensive Rebound %29.1%
37.5%Free Throw Rate30.7%
6.6Average Margin-10.3
MMH GAME INTELLIGENCE
MODEL READ

UT Martin HAS THE EDGE

WIN PROBABILITY73.4%
STATISTICAL ADVANTAGE
9–2
MMH comparison metrics
WHERE THE EDGE COMES FROMUT Martin holds the advantage in MMH Power Index (49.8–36.1), offensive efficiency (103.8–99.4), defensive efficiency (94.0–114.9), net efficiency (9.8–-15.5).
Chicago State COUNTERS WITHstrength of schedule (0.5–-4.8), ball security (15.8–21.4).
Final
UT Martin logo
UT Martin
94—71
Chicago State logo
Chicago State
UT Martin by 23 • 76.4 estimated possessions

Team Stats

UT MartinTEAM STATChicago State
31-58FG26-69
53.0%FG%38.0%
11-223PT11-38
50.0%3PT%29.0%
21-27FT8-15
78.0%FT%53.0%
47Rebounds29
10Offensive Rebounds10
15Assists11
16Turnovers10
7Steals10
—Blocks4
16Fouls23

Player Box Score

UT Martin
PlayerPosMinFG3PTFTREBASTSTLBLKTOPFPTS
Jordan SearsGuard328-114-67-852200027
Jacob CrewsG289-124-53-582200025
Issa MuhammadForward224-70-11-25010009
KK CurryForward160-40-17-84100007
Koby JeffriesGuard142-42-20-02100006
Jalen MyersF102-30-12-24010006
Justus JacksonGuard132-60-00-03200004
Desmond WilliamsGuard191-41-30-04300003
David KamwangaForward21-10-01-20000003
Sebastian MendozaGuard261-40-30-04410002
Christian FussellForward161-10-00-03000002
Braylon JacksonGuard20-10-00-01000000
Chicago State
PlayerPosMinFG3PTFTREBASTSTLBLKTOPFPTS
Wesley Cardet Jr.Guard349-145-83-721010026
Kedrick GreenGuard266-142-61-224100015
Brent DavisGuard323-51-31-12230008
Jahsean CorbettGuard242-92-70-04110006
Noble CrawfordForward252-40-11-24031005
Deshawn Jean-CharlesG232-71-40-07201005
A.J. Neal Jr.G111-40-30-00100002
Cameron JerniganForward101-40-10-11011002
Alex RaifordGuard20-10-02-22000002
Tristan ArneaudGuard100-50-30-02010000
Greg SpateG30-20-20-00000000

Advanced Game Stats

76.4Possessions76.4
123.0Offensive Efficiency92.9
92.9Defensive Efficiency123.0
30.1Net Efficiency-30.1
62.9%Effective FG%45.7%
66.4%True Shooting %46.6%
20.8%Turnover Rate13.1%
46.6%Free Throw Rate21.7%
37.9%3-Point Rate55.1%
0.94Assist / Turnover1.10
Game Summary
UT Martin won by 23 points. The game played at approximately 76.4 possessions. The largest advanced-stat separations came in Net Efficiency, Offensive Efficiency, Defensive Efficiency.

Advanced game metrics are calculated by Mid-Major Hoops from team box-score totals. Possessions are estimated. Highlighted advanced values indicate the stronger result for that metric; lower is better for defensive efficiency and turnover rate.