
Tulsa
30-8GAME THAT MATTERSAT
85.9%Tulsa
14.1%Little Rock
MMH WIN PROBABILITY
MODEL SPREADTulsa -11.6
PROJECTED TOTAL154.0
MODEL MONEYLINETulsa -609

Little Rock
12-20MMH MODEL PROJECTION
Projected ScoreTulsa 83
Projected Total154.0
Projected ScoreLittle Rock 71
Team Comparison
64.8MMH Power Index44
121.1Offensive Efficiency103.0
104.8Defensive Efficiency108.2
16.3Net Efficiency-5.2
0.0Strength of Schedule0.5
10.3Last 10 Net Efficiency-0.7
70.2Tempo68.5
55.4%Effective FG%50.3%
15.4%Turnover Rate18.7%
33.8%Offensive Rebound %32.1%
42.4%Free Throw Rate28.6%
11.5Average Margin-3.6
MMH GAME INTELLIGENCE
MODEL READ
Tulsa HAS THE EDGE
WIN PROBABILITY85.9%
STATISTICAL ADVANTAGE
10–1
MMH comparison metrics
WHERE THE EDGE COMES FROMTulsa holds the advantage in MMH Power Index (64.8–44.0), offensive efficiency (121.1–103.0), defensive efficiency (104.8–108.2), net efficiency (16.3–-5.2).
Little Rock COUNTERS WITHstrength of schedule (0.5–0.0).