North Carolina A&T

11-19

GAME THAT MATTERSAT

13.2%North Carolina A&T

86.8%Samford

MMH WIN PROBABILITY

MODEL SPREADSamford -12.3

PROJECTED TOTAL156.4

MODEL MONEYLINESamford -658

Samford

18-14

MMH MODEL PROJECTION

Projected ScoreNorth Carolina A&T 72

Projected Total156.4

Projected ScoreSamford 84

Team Comparison

North Carolina A&TMetricSamford

41.8MMH Power Index54.1

107.4Offensive Efficiency113.5

111.4Defensive Efficiency108.3

-4.0Net Efficiency5.2

-1.5Strength of Schedule-2.9

-11.2Last 10 Net Efficiency14.0

69.9Tempo69.5

51.5%Effective FG%54.0%

18.4%Turnover Rate13.3%

31.7%Offensive Rebound %25.3%

46.7%Free Throw Rate42.5%

-2.8Average Margin3.6

MMH GAME INTELLIGENCE

MODEL READ

Samford HAS THE EDGE

WIN PROBABILITY86.8%

STATISTICAL ADVANTAGE

8–3

MMH comparison metrics

WHERE THE EDGE COMES FROMSamford holds the advantage in MMH Power Index (54.1–41.8), offensive efficiency (113.5–107.4), defensive efficiency (108.3–111.4), net efficiency (5.2–-4.0).

North Carolina A&T COUNTERS WITHstrength of schedule (-1.5–-2.9), offensive rebounding (31.7–25.3), free throw rate (46.7–42.5).

Final

North Carolina A&T

83—101

Samford

Samford by 18 • 79.1 estimated possessions

Team Stats

North Carolina A&TTEAM STATSamford

27-61FG36-67

44.0%FG%54.0%

8-213PT11-25

38.0%3PT%44.0%

21-32FT18-21

66.0%FT%86.0%

31Rebounds40

8Offensive Rebounds11

15Assists27

12Turnovers12

7Steals6

3Blocks3

21Fouls24

Player Box Score

North Carolina A&T

Player	Pos	Min	FG	3PT	FT	REB	AST	STL	BLK	PTS
Landon Glasper	Guard	37	5-14	2-7	5-8	4	3	0	0	17
Jeremy Robinson	Forward	26	5-9	0-0	7-8	9	1	0	1	17
Uchenna Kellman-Nicholes	G	28	5-11	5-11	1-4	2	0	1	0	16
Kyle Duke	G	37	4-11	0-1	5-7	4	3	0	0	13
Camian Shell	G	37	4-10	0-1	2-3	1	7	2	1	10
Jalal McKie	G	10	2-2	1-1	0-0	2	0	0	0	5
Nikos Chitikoudis	F	14	1-2	0-0	1-2	4	0	3	1	3
Evan Joyner	Forward	8	1-1	0-0	0-0	1	1	1	0	2
Naj Ashley-Emory	Guard	3	0-1	0-0	0-0	0	0	0	0	0

Samford

Player	Pos	Min	FG	3PT	FT	REB	AST	STL	BLK	PTS
Achor Achor	F	16	8-9	1-1	9-10	6	2	0	0	26
Riley Allenspach	F	13	5-8	1-1	2-2	2	0	0	0	13
AJ Staton-McCray	G	20	3-8	1-3	2-2	3	3	0	0	9
Nathan Johnson	Forward	16	2-4	1-2	4-4	4	0	1	0	9
Dallas Graziani	Guard	19	3-7	2-5	0-0	2	1	1	0	8
Jaden Campbell	Guard	15	3-5	2-3	0-0	5	1	0	1	8
Josh Holloway	G	15	3-7	1-2	1-1	0	2	0	0	8
Chandler Leopard	Guard	15	2-5	1-3	0-0	2	2	1	0	5
Garrett Hicks	Guard	22	2-3	0-1	0-0	1	5	0	0	4
Lukas Walls	G	14	2-4	0-0	0-0	0	1	2	0	4
Zach Loveday	Center	12	2-3	0-0	0-2	7	1	0	2	4
Rylan Jones	Guard	23	1-4	1-4	0-0	1	9	1	0	3

Advanced Game Stats

79.1Possessions79.1

104.9Offensive Efficiency127.7

127.7Defensive Efficiency104.9

-22.8Net Efficiency22.8

50.8%Effective FG%61.9%

54.5%True Shooting %65.6%

15.0%Turnover Rate15.4%

52.5%Free Throw Rate31.3%

34.4%3-Point Rate37.3%

1.25Assist / Turnover2.25

Game Summary

Samford won by 18 points. The game played at approximately 79.1 possessions. The largest advanced-stat separations came in Net Efficiency, Offensive Efficiency, Defensive Efficiency.

Advanced game metrics are calculated by Mid-Major Hoops from team box-score totals. Possessions are estimated. Highlighted advanced values indicate the stronger result for that metric; lower is better for defensive efficiency and turnover rate.