
Incarnate Word
12-19GAME THAT MATTERSAT
74.3%Incarnate Word
25.7%UTSA
MMH WIN PROBABILITY
MODEL SPREADIncarnate Word -6.9
PROJECTED TOTAL151.0
MODEL MONEYLINEIncarnate Word -289

UTSA
5-25MMH MODEL PROJECTION
Projected ScoreIncarnate Word 79
Projected Total151.0
Projected ScoreUTSA 72
Team Comparison
44.6MMH Power Index30.5
112.0Offensive Efficiency99.0
111.2Defensive Efficiency115.0
0.8Net Efficiency-16.0
-3.6Strength of Schedule-1.2
-8.5Last 10 Net Efficiency-17.6
66.3Tempo70.2
52.2%Effective FG%45.9%
16.8%Turnover Rate17.0%
34.4%Offensive Rebound %30.9%
34.0%Free Throw Rate29.9%
0.5Average Margin-11.3
MMH GAME INTELLIGENCE
MODEL READ
Incarnate Word HAS THE EDGE
WIN PROBABILITY74.3%
STATISTICAL ADVANTAGE
10–1
MMH comparison metrics
WHERE THE EDGE COMES FROMIncarnate Word holds the advantage in MMH Power Index (44.6–30.5), offensive efficiency (112.0–99.0), defensive efficiency (111.2–115.0), net efficiency (0.8–-16.0).
UTSA COUNTERS WITHstrength of schedule (-1.2–-3.6).