
Furman
22-13GAME THAT MATTERSAT
30.1%Furman
69.9%UAB
MMH WIN PROBABILITY
MODEL SPREADUAB -6.0
PROJECTED TOTAL152.2
MODEL MONEYLINEUAB -232

UAB
20-12MMH MODEL PROJECTION
Projected ScoreFurman 73
Projected Total152.2
Projected ScoreUAB 79
Team Comparison
53.9MMH Power Index56.9
113.3Offensive Efficiency110.5
105.1Defensive Efficiency102.9
8.2Net Efficiency7.6
-1.8Strength of Schedule0.4
4.6Last 10 Net Efficiency2.9
67.4Tempo71.7
55.4%Effective FG%48.8%
17.7%Turnover Rate12.4%
31.7%Offensive Rebound %32.7%
32.6%Free Throw Rate36.9%
5.5Average Margin5.4
MMH GAME INTELLIGENCE
MODEL READ
UAB HAS THE EDGE
WIN PROBABILITY69.9%
STATISTICAL ADVANTAGE
6–5
MMH comparison metrics
WHERE THE EDGE COMES FROMUAB holds the advantage in MMH Power Index (56.9–53.9), defensive efficiency (102.9–105.1), strength of schedule (0.4–-1.8), ball security (12.4–17.7).
Furman COUNTERS WITHoffensive efficiency (113.3–110.5), net efficiency (8.2–7.6), recent form (4.6–2.9).