Alabama A&M logo

Alabama A&M

18-15
GAME THAT MATTERSAT
51.2%Alabama A&M
48.8%Cleveland State
MMH WIN PROBABILITY
MODEL SPREADAlabama A&M -0.3
PROJECTED TOTAL158.2
MODEL MONEYLINEAlabama A&M -105
Cleveland State logo

Cleveland State

11-22
MMH MODEL PROJECTION
Projected ScoreAlabama A&M 79
Projected Total158.2
Projected ScoreCleveland State 79

Team Comparison

42.3MMH Power Index37.3
105.9Offensive Efficiency111.6
106.6Defensive Efficiency120.2
-0.7Net Efficiency-8.6
-6.8Strength of Schedule-1.7
3.3Last 10 Net Efficiency-14.6
68.0Tempo71.5
49.7%Effective FG%55.0%
16.8%Turnover Rate18.0%
28.0%Offensive Rebound %28.6%
45.7%Free Throw Rate38.7%
-0.5Average Margin-6.2
MMH GAME INTELLIGENCE
MODEL READ

Alabama A&M HAS THE EDGE

WIN PROBABILITY51.2%
STATISTICAL ADVANTAGE
7–4
MMH comparison metrics
WHERE THE EDGE COMES FROMAlabama A&M holds the advantage in MMH Power Index (42.3–37.3), defensive efficiency (106.6–120.2), net efficiency (-0.7–-8.6), recent form (3.3–-14.6).
Cleveland State COUNTERS WITHoffensive efficiency (111.6–105.9), strength of schedule (-1.7–-6.8), shooting efficiency (55.0–49.7).
Final
Alabama A&M logo
Alabama A&M
59—86
Cleveland State logo
Cleveland State
Cleveland State by 27 • 70.6 estimated possessions

Team Stats

Alabama A&MTEAM STATCleveland State
20-55FG28-50
36.0%FG%56.0%
1-143PT8-19
7.0%3PT%42.0%
18-31FT22-26
58.0%FT%85.0%
32Rebounds35
18Offensive Rebounds10
14Assists16
20Turnovers17
10Steals14
1Blocks6
20Fouls21

Player Box Score

Alabama A&M
PlayerPosMinFG3PTFTREBASTSTLBLKTOPFPTS
Dylan McleanGuard166-90-10-020000012
Dailin SmithG203-100-35-743300011
Omari PeekGuard184-70-10-21000008
Lorenzo DowneyGuard172-30-13-46010007
London RileyGuard192-51-40-02210005
Chad MoodieF150-30-04-42100004
EJ WilliamsCenter141-20-02-42100004
Eric LeeGuard111-20-12-60110004
Jayland RandallG201-50-21-21100003
William TavaresCenter120-10-01-22000001
Caleb BlackwellG210-40-10-03540000
AC BryantG160-40-00-01001000
Joshua HughleyGuard10-00-00-00000000
Cleveland State
PlayerPosMinFG3PTFTREBASTSTLBLKTOPFPTS
Drew LowderGuard307-134-80-014200018
Tae WilliamsGuard286-112-34-434100018
Tevin SmithGuard234-70-28-850210016
Tristan EnarunaForward184-81-13-674110012
Chase RobinsonGuard190-10-17-81030007
Jayson WoodrichGuard192-41-30-06110005
Dylan ArnettF282-20-00-07122004
Ramar PryorGuard122-30-10-00010004
Jalin RiceG221-10-00-01212002
Dok MuordarC10-00-00-00000000

Advanced Game Stats

70.6Possessions70.6
83.6Offensive Efficiency121.8
121.8Defensive Efficiency83.6
-38.2Net Efficiency38.2
37.3%Effective FG%64.0%
42.3%True Shooting %69.0%
27.9%Turnover Rate24.5%
56.4%Free Throw Rate52.0%
25.5%3-Point Rate38.0%
0.70Assist / Turnover0.94
Game Summary
Cleveland State won by 27 points. The game played at approximately 70.6 possessions. The largest advanced-stat separations came in Net Efficiency, Offensive Efficiency, Defensive Efficiency.

Advanced game metrics are calculated by Mid-Major Hoops from team box-score totals. Possessions are estimated. Highlighted advanced values indicate the stronger result for that metric; lower is better for defensive efficiency and turnover rate.