
UTEP
11-20GAME THAT MATTERSAT
24.6%UTEP
75.4%Loyola Marymount
MMH WIN PROBABILITY
MODEL SPREADLoyola Marymount -8.6
PROJECTED TOTAL144.6
MODEL MONEYLINELoyola Marymount -307

Loyola Marymount
15-17MMH MODEL PROJECTION
Projected ScoreUTEP 68
Projected Total144.6
Projected ScoreLoyola Marymount 77
Team Comparison
44.4MMH Power Index49.9
102.6Offensive Efficiency107.0
107.1Defensive Efficiency103.8
-4.5Net Efficiency3.2
1.7Strength of Schedule0.5
-4.7Last 10 Net Efficiency-1.2
67.6Tempo69.4
49.2%Effective FG%52.8%
17.3%Turnover Rate17.2%
27.6%Offensive Rebound %27.3%
35.6%Free Throw Rate32.1%
-3.1Average Margin2.2
MMH GAME INTELLIGENCE
MODEL READ
Loyola Marymount HAS THE EDGE
WIN PROBABILITY75.4%
STATISTICAL ADVANTAGE
8–3
MMH comparison metrics
WHERE THE EDGE COMES FROMLoyola Marymount holds the advantage in MMH Power Index (49.9–44.4), offensive efficiency (107.0–102.6), defensive efficiency (103.8–107.1), net efficiency (3.2–-4.5).
UTEP COUNTERS WITHstrength of schedule (1.7–0.5), offensive rebounding (27.6–27.3), free throw rate (35.6–32.1).