
Bowling Green
18-14GAME THAT MATTERSAT
56.2%Bowling Green
43.8%Lipscomb
MMH WIN PROBABILITY
MODEL SPREADBowling Green -2.0
PROJECTED TOTAL154.2
MODEL MONEYLINEBowling Green -128

Lipscomb
18-13MMH MODEL PROJECTION
Projected ScoreBowling Green 78
Projected Total154.2
Projected ScoreLipscomb 76
Team Comparison
54.7MMH Power Index47.9
112.6Offensive Efficiency111.3
99.1Defensive Efficiency107.6
13.5Net Efficiency3.7
-4.7Strength of Schedule-2.5
1.4Last 10 Net Efficiency-1.0
72.2Tempo68.8
53.4%Effective FG%54.8%
15.9%Turnover Rate16.0%
29.2%Offensive Rebound %25.9%
38.7%Free Throw Rate26.5%
9.8Average Margin2.5
MMH GAME INTELLIGENCE
MODEL READ
Bowling Green HAS THE EDGE
WIN PROBABILITY56.2%
STATISTICAL ADVANTAGE
9–2
MMH comparison metrics
WHERE THE EDGE COMES FROMBowling Green holds the advantage in MMH Power Index (54.7–47.9), offensive efficiency (112.6–111.3), defensive efficiency (99.1–107.6), net efficiency (13.5–3.7).
Lipscomb COUNTERS WITHstrength of schedule (-2.5–-4.7), shooting efficiency (54.8–53.4).