
Arkansas State
20-12GAME THAT MATTERSAT
42.6%Arkansas State
57.4%UT Rio Grande Valley
MMH WIN PROBABILITY
MODEL SPREADUT Rio Grande Valley -3.0
PROJECTED TOTAL155.4
MODEL MONEYLINEUT Rio Grande Valley -135

UT Rio Grande Valley
19-14MMH MODEL PROJECTION
Projected ScoreArkansas State 76
Projected Total155.4
Projected ScoreUT Rio Grande Valley 79
Team Comparison
57.7MMH Power Index55.8
113.1Offensive Efficiency112.6
105.3Defensive Efficiency103.1
7.8Net Efficiency9.5
-1.0Strength of Schedule-1.9
15.2Last 10 Net Efficiency12.3
73.3Tempo67.4
52.7%Effective FG%55.7%
19.4%Turnover Rate17.9%
38.1%Offensive Rebound %29.2%
39.6%Free Throw Rate29.6%
5.8Average Margin6.4
MMH GAME INTELLIGENCE
MODEL READ
Arkansas State HAS THE EDGE
WIN PROBABILITY57.4%
STATISTICAL ADVANTAGE
6–5
MMH comparison metrics
WHERE THE EDGE COMES FROMArkansas State holds the advantage in MMH Power Index (57.7–55.8), offensive efficiency (113.1–112.6), strength of schedule (-1.0–-1.9), recent form (15.2–12.3).
UT Rio Grande Valley COUNTERS WITHdefensive efficiency (103.1–105.3), net efficiency (9.5–7.8), shooting efficiency (55.7–52.7).