Stonehill

12-21

GAME THAT MATTERSAT

12.3%Stonehill

87.7%Quinnipiac

MMH WIN PROBABILITY

MODEL SPREADQuinnipiac -12.9

PROJECTED TOTAL140.9

MODEL MONEYLINEQuinnipiac -713

Quinnipiac

19-13

MMH MODEL PROJECTION

Projected ScoreStonehill 64

Projected Total140.9

Projected ScoreQuinnipiac 77

Team Comparison

StonehillMetricQuinnipiac

37.9MMH Power Index51

97.5Offensive Efficiency106.8

100.7Defensive Efficiency102.1

-3.2Net Efficiency4.7

-5.4Strength of Schedule-2.3

-3.4Last 10 Net Efficiency2.2

68.1Tempo70.5

48.0%Effective FG%48.9%

19.1%Turnover Rate15.6%

28.4%Offensive Rebound %34.1%

29.2%Free Throw Rate34.1%

-2.2Average Margin3.4

MMH GAME INTELLIGENCE

MODEL READ

Quinnipiac HAS THE EDGE

WIN PROBABILITY87.7%

STATISTICAL ADVANTAGE

10–1

MMH comparison metrics

WHERE THE EDGE COMES FROMQuinnipiac holds the advantage in MMH Power Index (51.0–37.9), offensive efficiency (106.8–97.5), net efficiency (4.7–-3.2), strength of schedule (-2.3–-5.4).

Stonehill COUNTERS WITHdefensive efficiency (100.7–102.1).

Final

Stonehill

69—80

Quinnipiac

Quinnipiac by 11 • 68.0 estimated possessions

Team Stats

StonehillTEAM STATQuinnipiac

27-60FG27-55

45.0%FG%49.0%

12-253PT14-27

48.0%3PT%52.0%

3-8FT12-13

38.0%FT%92.0%

24Rebounds31

6Offensive Rebounds9

17Assists23

13Turnovers13

8Steals7

1Blocks9

12Fouls14

Player Box Score

Stonehill

Player	Pos	Min	FG	3PT	FT	REB	AST	STL	BLK	PTS
Max Zegarowski	Forward	35	7-18	4-9	0-0	4	1	0	0	18
Jackson Benigni	G	33	7-12	4-5	0-2	5	2	1	0	18
Tony Felder	Guard	28	6-16	2-7	0-0	1	7	2	0	14
Ethan Meuser	F	24	3-4	2-3	2-2	0	4	1	0	10
Chas Stinson	G	28	3-4	0-0	0-0	1	1	1	0	6
Pano Pavlidis	Forward	14	1-4	0-1	0-2	4	1	1	1	2
Thatcher Stone	G	9	0-0	0-0	1-2	2	0	0	0	1
Nathan McGill	Guard	16	0-1	0-0	0-0	4	0	1	0	0
Louie Semona III	F	13	0-1	0-0	0-0	1	1	1	0	0

Quinnipiac

Player	Pos	Min	FG	3PT	FT	REB	AST	STL	BLK	PTS
Matt Balanc	Guard	29	6-9	6-7	6-6	5	5	0	0	24
Amarri Monroe	F	21	5-10	1-2	3-3	5	2	3	5	14
Alexis Reyes	Forward	27	4-5	3-4	2-2	2	3	2	0	13
Rihards Vavers	F	30	3-9	3-8	0-0	6	2	0	2	9
Paul Otieno	F	26	4-4	0-0	0-0	5	0	0	1	8
Savion Lewis	Guard	26	2-4	0-0	1-2	0	7	1	0	5
Doug Young	G	16	2-7	1-3	0-0	4	3	0	0	5
Khaden Bennett	G	11	1-4	0-3	0-0	2	0	0	1	2
Richie Springs	Forward	14	0-3	0-0	0-0	2	1	1	0	0

Advanced Game Stats

68.0Possessions68.0

101.5Offensive Efficiency117.6

117.6Defensive Efficiency101.5

-16.2Net Efficiency16.2

55.0%Effective FG%61.8%

54.1%True Shooting %65.4%

18.4%Turnover Rate19.9%

13.3%Free Throw Rate23.6%

41.7%3-Point Rate49.1%

1.31Assist / Turnover1.77

Game Summary

Quinnipiac won by 11 points. The game played at approximately 68.0 possessions. The largest advanced-stat separations came in Net Efficiency, Offensive Efficiency, Defensive Efficiency.

Advanced game metrics are calculated by Mid-Major Hoops from team box-score totals. Possessions are estimated. Highlighted advanced values indicate the stronger result for that metric; lower is better for defensive efficiency and turnover rate.