
Bethune-Cookman
17-15GAME THAT MATTERSAT
30.6%Bethune-Cookman
69.4%Longwood
MMH WIN PROBABILITY
MODEL SPREADLongwood -7.3
PROJECTED TOTAL154.6
MODEL MONEYLINELongwood -227

Longwood
16-16MMH MODEL PROJECTION
Projected ScoreBethune-Cookman 74
Projected Total154.6
Projected ScoreLongwood 81
Team Comparison
44.2MMH Power Index47
104.7Offensive Efficiency108.1
106.9Defensive Efficiency103.0
-2.2Net Efficiency5.1
-3.3Strength of Schedule-6.4
4.0Last 10 Net Efficiency2.3
72.0Tempo71.9
51.9%Effective FG%51.4%
19.2%Turnover Rate19.3%
30.3%Offensive Rebound %35.4%
41.9%Free Throw Rate42.0%
-1.6Average Margin3.6
MMH GAME INTELLIGENCE
MODEL READ
Longwood HAS THE EDGE
WIN PROBABILITY69.4%
STATISTICAL ADVANTAGE
7–4
MMH comparison metrics
WHERE THE EDGE COMES FROMLongwood holds the advantage in MMH Power Index (47.0–44.2), offensive efficiency (108.1–104.7), defensive efficiency (103.0–106.9), net efficiency (5.1–-2.2).
Bethune-Cookman COUNTERS WITHstrength of schedule (-3.3–-6.4), recent form (4.0–2.3), shooting efficiency (51.9–51.4).