Canisius logo

Canisius

10-21
GAME THAT MATTERSAT
5.6%Canisius
94.4%Bowling Green
MMH WIN PROBABILITY
MODEL SPREADBowling Green -20.3
PROJECTED TOTAL143.3
MODEL MONEYLINEBowling Green -1686
Bowling Green logo

Bowling Green

18-14
MMH MODEL PROJECTION
Projected ScoreCanisius 62
Projected Total143.3
Projected ScoreBowling Green 82

Team Comparison

33.9MMH Power Index54.7
97.1Offensive Efficiency112.6
108.8Defensive Efficiency99.1
-11.7Net Efficiency13.5
-1.8Strength of Schedule-4.7
-10.0Last 10 Net Efficiency1.4
64.8Tempo72.2
46.8%Effective FG%53.4%
19.6%Turnover Rate15.9%
29.1%Offensive Rebound %29.2%
32.4%Free Throw Rate38.7%
-7.5Average Margin9.8
MMH GAME INTELLIGENCE
MODEL READ

Bowling Green HAS THE EDGE

WIN PROBABILITY94.4%
STATISTICAL ADVANTAGE
10–1
MMH comparison metrics
WHERE THE EDGE COMES FROMBowling Green holds the advantage in MMH Power Index (54.7–33.9), offensive efficiency (112.6–97.1), defensive efficiency (99.1–108.8), net efficiency (13.5–-11.7).
Canisius COUNTERS WITHstrength of schedule (-1.8–-4.7).
Final
Canisius logo
Canisius
73—77
Bowling Green logo
Bowling Green
Bowling Green by 4 • 64.2 estimated possessions

Team Stats

CanisiusTEAM STATBowling Green
31-66FG29-58
47.0%FG%50.0%
10-243PT7-15
42.0%3PT%47.0%
1-3FT12-19
33.0%FT%63.0%
30Rebounds35
8Offensive Rebounds10
16Assists13
6Turnovers6
2Steals2
5Blocks4
13Fouls8

Player Box Score

Canisius
PlayerPosMinFG3PTFTREBASTSTLBLKTOPFPTS
Frank MitchellF349-150-01-1100030019
Tre DinkinsG346-134-90-037000016
Siem UijtendaalGuard325-143-60-031100013
Bryce OkpohForward174-71-10-23001009
Youri FritzF293-70-10-04010006
TJ GadsdenGuard302-41-30-03401005
Devean WilliamsG61-11-10-02100003
Cameron PalesseG181-50-30-00300002
Bowling Green
PlayerPosMinFG3PTFTREBASTSTLBLKTOPFPTS
Marcus HillG3710-210-16-834000026
Jason SpurginCenter326-101-34-573010017
DaJion HumphreyG363-53-50-02300009
Da'Shawn PhillipGuard343-72-40-04110008
Sam TownsF223-60-02-27001008
Rashaun AgeeF233-60-00-48012006
DJ SmithG161-31-20-02200003

Advanced Game Stats

64.2Possessions64.2
113.7Offensive Efficiency119.9
119.9Defensive Efficiency113.7
-6.2Net Efficiency6.2
54.5%Effective FG%56.0%
54.1%True Shooting %57.4%
9.2%Turnover Rate9.5%
4.5%Free Throw Rate32.8%
36.4%3-Point Rate25.9%
2.67Assist / Turnover2.17
Game Summary
Bowling Green won by 4 points. The game played at approximately 64.2 possessions. The largest advanced-stat separations came in Free Throw Rate, Net Efficiency, Offensive Efficiency.

Advanced game metrics are calculated by Mid-Major Hoops from team box-score totals. Possessions are estimated. Highlighted advanced values indicate the stronger result for that metric; lower is better for defensive efficiency and turnover rate.