
Canisius
10-21GAME THAT MATTERSAT
5.6%Canisius
94.4%Bowling Green
MMH WIN PROBABILITY
MODEL SPREADBowling Green -20.3
PROJECTED TOTAL143.3
MODEL MONEYLINEBowling Green -1686

Bowling Green
18-14MMH MODEL PROJECTION
Projected ScoreCanisius 62
Projected Total143.3
Projected ScoreBowling Green 82
Team Comparison
33.9MMH Power Index54.7
97.1Offensive Efficiency112.6
108.8Defensive Efficiency99.1
-11.7Net Efficiency13.5
-1.8Strength of Schedule-4.7
-10.0Last 10 Net Efficiency1.4
64.8Tempo72.2
46.8%Effective FG%53.4%
19.6%Turnover Rate15.9%
29.1%Offensive Rebound %29.2%
32.4%Free Throw Rate38.7%
-7.5Average Margin9.8
MMH GAME INTELLIGENCE
MODEL READ
Bowling Green HAS THE EDGE
WIN PROBABILITY94.4%
STATISTICAL ADVANTAGE
10–1
MMH comparison metrics
WHERE THE EDGE COMES FROMBowling Green holds the advantage in MMH Power Index (54.7–33.9), offensive efficiency (112.6–97.1), defensive efficiency (99.1–108.8), net efficiency (13.5–-11.7).
Canisius COUNTERS WITHstrength of schedule (-1.8–-4.7).