
Charleston
21-11GAME THAT MATTERSAT
35.2%Charleston
64.8%Kent State
MMH WIN PROBABILITY
MODEL SPREADKent State -5.5
PROJECTED TOTAL159.9
MODEL MONEYLINEKent State -184

Kent State
24-10MMH MODEL PROJECTION
Projected ScoreCharleston 77
Projected Total159.9
Projected ScoreKent State 83
Team Comparison
53.8MMH Power Index54.7
109.2Offensive Efficiency113.9
106.2Defensive Efficiency107.6
3.0Net Efficiency6.3
1.9Strength of Schedule-0.1
3.9Last 10 Net Efficiency2.1
69.1Tempo74.0
50.6%Effective FG%53.0%
15.4%Turnover Rate17.7%
29.6%Offensive Rebound %35.0%
42.1%Free Throw Rate43.5%
2.0Average Margin4.7
MMH GAME INTELLIGENCE
MODEL READ
Kent State HAS THE EDGE
WIN PROBABILITY64.8%
STATISTICAL ADVANTAGE
7–4
MMH comparison metrics
WHERE THE EDGE COMES FROMKent State holds the advantage in MMH Power Index (54.7–53.8), offensive efficiency (113.9–109.2), net efficiency (6.3–3.0), shooting efficiency (53.0–50.6).
Charleston COUNTERS WITHdefensive efficiency (106.2–107.6), strength of schedule (1.9–-0.1), recent form (3.9–2.1).