Saint Peter's

17-12

GAME THAT MATTERSAT

41.8%Saint Peter's

58.2%Rutgers

MMH WIN PROBABILITY

MODEL SPREADRutgers -1.1

PROJECTED TOTAL142.7

MODEL MONEYLINERutgers -139

Rutgers

13-20

MMH MODEL PROJECTION

Projected ScoreSaint Peter's 71

Projected Total142.7

Projected ScoreRutgers 72

Team Comparison

Saint Peter'sMetricRutgers

47.5MMH Power Index45.9

106.6Offensive Efficiency104.2

103.0Defensive Efficiency112.2

3.6Net Efficiency-8.0

-3.8Strength of Schedule3.9

-1.5Last 10 Net Efficiency-1.6

66.4Tempo67.4

47.6%Effective FG%47.4%

17.5%Turnover Rate15.0%

36.8%Offensive Rebound %29.2%

36.6%Free Throw Rate36.3%

2.4Average Margin-5.4

MMH GAME INTELLIGENCE

MODEL READ

Saint Peter's HAS THE EDGE

WIN PROBABILITY58.2%

STATISTICAL ADVANTAGE

9–2

MMH comparison metrics

WHERE THE EDGE COMES FROMSaint Peter's holds the advantage in MMH Power Index (47.5–45.9), offensive efficiency (106.6–104.2), defensive efficiency (103.0–112.2), net efficiency (3.6–-8.0).

Rutgers COUNTERS WITHstrength of schedule (3.9–-3.8), ball security (15.0–17.5).

Final

Saint Peter's

40—71

Rutgers

Rutgers by 31 • 66.1 estimated possessions

Team Stats

Saint Peter'sTEAM STATRutgers

13-55FG21-55

24.0%FG%38.0%

3-193PT6-20

16.0%3PT%30.0%

11-21FT23-32

52.0%FT%72.0%

51Rebounds38

22Offensive Rebounds11

5Assists13

23Turnovers7

4Steals12

3Blocks9

27Fouls21

Player Box Score

Saint Peter's

Player	Pos	Min	FG	3PT	FT	REB	AST	STL	BLK	PTS
Michael Houge	F	31	5-16	0-3	6-9	12	0	0	2	16
Armoni Zeigler	G	21	3-6	1-3	1-3	5	0	0	0	8
Mouhamed Sow	F	24	2-6	1-1	0-2	3	0	0	0	5
Brent Bland	G	24	1-5	1-5	0-0	2	1	1	0	3
Marcus Randolph	Guard	21	0-4	0-3	3-4	3	0	0	0	3
Roy Clarke	Guard	19	1-3	0-1	0-0	5	2	1	0	2
Stephon Roberts	Forward	15	1-1	0-0	0-2	4	0	0	1	2
Elijah Perkins	G	16	0-3	0-1	1-1	2	1	0	0	1
Latrell Reid	Guard	23	0-10	0-1	0-0	4	1	2	0	0
Elijah Wood	Guard	6	0-1	0-1	0-0	2	0	0	0	0

Rutgers

Player	Pos	Min	FG	3PT	FT	REB	AST	STL	BLK	PTS
Noah Fernandes	Guard	26	5-9	0-2	9-9	4	3	1	2	19
Clifford Omoruyi	Center	26	6-12	0-0	5-6	8	0	0	4	17
Derek Simpson	G	27	3-8	2-4	2-4	2	1	1	0	10
Aundre Hyatt	Forward	28	2-11	1-6	3-6	6	1	2	1	8
Gavin Griffiths	G	22	2-5	2-3	0-0	4	1	2	1	6
Oskar Palmquist	Forward	12	0-2	0-1	4-4	1	0	1	1	4
Austin Williams	Guard	12	2-2	0-0	0-0	3	0	2	0	4
Antwone Woolfolk	F	17	1-1	1-1	0-1	1	3	1	0	3
Jamichael Davis	G	19	0-1	0-0	0-2	1	4	2	0	0
Antonio Chol	F	5	0-3	0-2	0-0	1	0	0	0	0
Jacob Morales	Guard	2	0-1	0-1	0-0	1	0	0	0	0
Aiden Terry	Guard	2	0-0	0-0	0-0	0	0	0	0	0
Zach Hayn	Guard	2	0-0	0-0	0-0	0	0	0	0	0

Advanced Game Stats

66.1Possessions66.1

60.5Offensive Efficiency107.4

107.4Defensive Efficiency60.5

-46.9Net Efficiency46.9

26.4%Effective FG%43.6%

30.8%True Shooting %50.6%

34.9%Turnover Rate10.6%

38.2%Free Throw Rate58.2%

34.5%3-Point Rate36.4%

0.22Assist / Turnover1.86

Game Summary

Rutgers won by 31 points. The game played at approximately 66.1 possessions. The largest advanced-stat separations came in Net Efficiency, Offensive Efficiency, Defensive Efficiency.

Advanced game metrics are calculated by Mid-Major Hoops from team box-score totals. Possessions are estimated. Highlighted advanced values indicate the stronger result for that metric; lower is better for defensive efficiency and turnover rate.