Utah Tech

19-15

GAME THAT MATTERSAT

38.9%Utah Tech

61.1%Lindenwood

MMH WIN PROBABILITY

MODEL SPREADLindenwood -4.9

PROJECTED TOTAL153.4

MODEL MONEYLINELindenwood -157

Lindenwood

18-15

MMH MODEL PROJECTION

Projected ScoreUtah Tech 74

Projected Total153.4

Projected ScoreLindenwood 79

Team Comparison

Utah TechMetricLindenwood

47.3MMH Power Index46.8

108.8Offensive Efficiency105.5

106.1Defensive Efficiency98.6

2.7Net Efficiency6.9

-2.3Strength of Schedule-6.8

-2.0Last 10 Net Efficiency-1.4

70.6Tempo73.7

54.4%Effective FG%50.2%

17.5%Turnover Rate18.3%

28.1%Offensive Rebound %34.0%

32.8%Free Throw Rate37.9%

1.9Average Margin5.1

MMH GAME INTELLIGENCE

MODEL READ

Lindenwood HAS THE EDGE

WIN PROBABILITY61.1%

STATISTICAL ADVANTAGE

6–5

MMH comparison metrics

WHERE THE EDGE COMES FROMLindenwood holds the advantage in defensive efficiency (98.6–106.1), net efficiency (6.9–2.7), recent form (-1.4–-2.0), offensive rebounding (34.0–28.1).

Utah Tech COUNTERS WITHMMH Power Index (47.3–46.8), offensive efficiency (108.8–105.5), strength of schedule (-2.3–-6.8).

Final

Utah Tech

73—66

Lindenwood

Utah Tech by 7 • 73.6 estimated possessions

Team Stats

Utah TechTEAM STATLindenwood

24-51FG24-69

47.0%FG%35.0%

7-193PT5-19

37.0%3PT%26.0%

18-28FT13-23

64.0%FT%57.0%

37Rebounds38

6Offensive Rebounds14

13Assists10

13Turnovers10

6Steals4

2Blocks4

19Fouls21

Player Box Score

Utah Tech

Player	Pos	Min	FG	3PT	FT	REB	AST	STL	BLK	PTS
Tanner Christensen	Center	31	7-10	1-2	5-7	9	0	0	1	20
Jaylen Searles	G	38	6-14	3-7	2-5	9	6	1	0	17
Noa Gonsalves	Guard	34	5-8	1-3	0-0	4	0	2	0	11
Beon Riley	Guard	23	2-5	0-1	6-6	3	0	0	0	10
Aric Demings	Guard	29	1-6	1-3	5-9	3	5	0	0	8
Tennessee Rainwater	F	4	1-2	1-2	0-0	1	0	0	0	3
Unisa Turay	Guard	17	1-4	0-1	0-0	2	2	3	0	2
Caleb Stearman	Forward	15	1-1	0-0	0-1	2	0	0	1	2
Hamed Olayinka	F	9	0-1	0-0	0-0	2	0	0	0	0

Lindenwood

Player	Pos	Min	FG	3PT	FT	REB	AST	STL	BLK	PTS
Keenon Cole	Forward	37	5-18	2-6	5-8	11	0	0	1	17
Darius Beane	Guard	26	5-12	0-1	4-4	8	2	2	0	14
Jaylon McDaniel	F	15	3-5	0-0	2-2	2	0	0	0	8
Keith Haymon II	Forward	32	2-7	2-6	0-0	2	2	0	0	6
Tommie Williams	Guard	22	3-9	0-0	0-0	2	2	0	0	6
Jeremiah Talton	F	27	2-6	1-3	0-0	4	0	1	1	5
Isaac Ondekane	C	17	2-3	0-0	1-7	7	1	0	2	5
Colin Ruffin	G	18	1-6	0-2	1-2	2	2	1	0	3
Amoro Lado	Guard	4	1-2	0-0	0-0	0	1	0	0	2
Nathan Johnson Jr.	Guard	2	0-1	0-1	0-0	0	0	0	0	0

Advanced Game Stats

73.6Possessions73.6

99.2Offensive Efficiency89.7

89.7Defensive Efficiency99.2

9.5Net Efficiency-9.5

53.9%Effective FG%38.4%

56.8%True Shooting %41.3%

18.2%Turnover Rate13.2%

54.9%Free Throw Rate33.3%

37.3%3-Point Rate27.5%

1.00Assist / Turnover1.00

Game Summary

Utah Tech won by 7 points. The game played at approximately 73.6 possessions. The largest advanced-stat separations came in Free Throw Rate, Net Efficiency, Effective FG%.

Advanced game metrics are calculated by Mid-Major Hoops from team box-score totals. Possessions are estimated. Highlighted advanced values indicate the stronger result for that metric; lower is better for defensive efficiency and turnover rate.