
McNeese
27-6GAME THAT MATTERSAT
64.2%McNeese
35.8%UAB
MMH WIN PROBABILITY
MODEL SPREADMcNeese -3.0
PROJECTED TOTAL149.2
MODEL MONEYLINEMcNeese -179

UAB
20-12MMH MODEL PROJECTION
Projected ScoreMcNeese 76
Projected Total149.2
Projected ScoreUAB 73
Team Comparison
66.7MMH Power Index56.9
117.4Offensive Efficiency110.5
98.3Defensive Efficiency102.9
19.1Net Efficiency7.6
-1.6Strength of Schedule0.4
15.5Last 10 Net Efficiency2.9
66.0Tempo71.7
52.2%Effective FG%48.8%
13.9%Turnover Rate12.4%
37.1%Offensive Rebound %32.7%
37.7%Free Throw Rate36.9%
12.6Average Margin5.4
MMH GAME INTELLIGENCE
MODEL READ
McNeese HAS THE EDGE
WIN PROBABILITY64.2%
STATISTICAL ADVANTAGE
9–2
MMH comparison metrics
WHERE THE EDGE COMES FROMMcNeese holds the advantage in MMH Power Index (66.7–56.9), offensive efficiency (117.4–110.5), defensive efficiency (98.3–102.9), net efficiency (19.1–7.6).
UAB COUNTERS WITHstrength of schedule (0.4–-1.6), ball security (12.4–13.9).