
Chattanooga
13-19GAME THAT MATTERSAT
32.5%Chattanooga
67.5%Lipscomb
MMH WIN PROBABILITY
MODEL SPREADLipscomb -5.8
PROJECTED TOTAL153.6
MODEL MONEYLINELipscomb -208

Lipscomb
18-13MMH MODEL PROJECTION
Projected ScoreChattanooga 74
Projected Total153.6
Projected ScoreLipscomb 80
Team Comparison
45.9MMH Power Index47.9
112.7Offensive Efficiency111.3
110.5Defensive Efficiency107.6
2.2Net Efficiency3.7
-4.4Strength of Schedule-2.5
-0.1Last 10 Net Efficiency-1.0
68.1Tempo68.8
55.1%Effective FG%54.8%
14.1%Turnover Rate16.0%
23.5%Offensive Rebound %25.9%
29.2%Free Throw Rate26.5%
1.4Average Margin2.5
MMH GAME INTELLIGENCE
MODEL READ
Lipscomb HAS THE EDGE
WIN PROBABILITY67.5%
STATISTICAL ADVANTAGE
6–5
MMH comparison metrics
WHERE THE EDGE COMES FROMLipscomb holds the advantage in MMH Power Index (47.9–45.9), defensive efficiency (107.6–110.5), net efficiency (3.7–2.2), strength of schedule (-2.5–-4.4).
Chattanooga COUNTERS WITHoffensive efficiency (112.7–111.3), recent form (-0.1–-1.0), shooting efficiency (55.1–54.8).