UC Irvine

23-12

GAME THAT MATTERSAT

58.6%UC Irvine

41.4%Duquesne

MMH WIN PROBABILITY

MODEL SPREADUC Irvine -1.9

PROJECTED TOTAL151.7

MODEL MONEYLINEUC Irvine -142

Duquesne

18-15

MMH MODEL PROJECTION

Projected ScoreUC Irvine 77

Projected Total151.7

Projected ScoreDuquesne 75

Team Comparison

UC IrvineMetricDuquesne

58.4MMH Power Index50.7

106.9Offensive Efficiency110.6

95.0Defensive Efficiency106.2

11.9Net Efficiency4.4

-1.0Strength of Schedule0.6

10.0Last 10 Net Efficiency-5.9

72.3Tempo70.8

50.7%Effective FG%53.4%

17.6%Turnover Rate17.7%

33.1%Offensive Rebound %30.6%

36.5%Free Throw Rate38.2%

8.6Average Margin3.1

MMH GAME INTELLIGENCE

MODEL READ

UC Irvine HAS THE EDGE

WIN PROBABILITY58.6%

STATISTICAL ADVANTAGE

7–4

MMH comparison metrics

WHERE THE EDGE COMES FROMUC Irvine holds the advantage in MMH Power Index (58.4–50.7), defensive efficiency (95.0–106.2), net efficiency (11.9–4.4), recent form (10.0–-5.9).

Duquesne COUNTERS WITHoffensive efficiency (110.6–106.9), strength of schedule (0.6–-1.0), shooting efficiency (53.4–50.7).

Final

UC Irvine

62—66

Duquesne

Duquesne by 4 • 67.2 estimated possessions

Team Stats

UC IrvineTEAM STATDuquesne

22-54FG24-58

41.0%FG%41.0%

7-183PT9-18

39.0%3PT%50.0%

11-11FT9-15

100.0%FT%60.0%

39Rebounds30

11Offensive Rebounds10

13Assists16

20Turnovers11

5Steals10

3Blocks6

20Fouls11

Player Box Score

UC Irvine

Player	Pos	Min	FG	3PT	FT	REB	AST	STL	BLK	PTS
Andre Henry	G	30	4-8	1-4	4-4	4	1	1	0	13
Justin Hohn	Guard	27	4-15	3-8	2-2	5	0	2	0	13
Derin Saran	G	18	5-8	2-2	0-0	3	2	0	0	12
Carter Welling	F	21	3-4	0-1	2-2	6	0	0	1	8
Devin Tillis	F	24	3-9	1-3	0-0	7	0	0	0	7
Dean Keeler	Forward	19	3-3	0-0	0-0	4	0	1	2	6
Dylan Thoerner	Guard	11	0-1	0-0	3-3	2	1	0	0	3
Pierre Crockrell II	Guard	23	0-4	0-0	0-0	2	5	0	0	0
Langston Redfield	G	11	0-1	0-0	0-0	0	2	0	0	0
Ofure Ujadughele	Guard	10	0-0	0-0	0-0	0	2	1	0	0
Hayden Welling	F	6	0-1	0-0	0-0	1	0	0	0	0

Duquesne

Player	Pos	Min	FG	3PT	FT	REB	AST	STL	BLK	PTS
Andrei Savrasov	Forward	25	6-10	3-4	0-0	7	1	3	1	15
David Dixon	F	24	5-9	0-1	2-3	5	2	2	5	12
Devone Grant	Guard	34	3-6	1-2	4-4	2	3	1	0	11
Jimmy Clark III	Guard	32	3-13	0-3	2-3	4	5	1	0	8
Kareem Rozier	G	35	2-7	2-3	0-0	0	2	1	0	6
Fousseyni Drame	Forward	20	2-4	1-2	1-3	4	1	1	0	6
Hassan Drame	Forward	12	2-3	2-2	0-0	2	1	1	0	6
Chabi Barre	F	9	1-5	0-0	0-2	1	1	0	0	2
Matúš Hronský	F	4	0-1	0-1	0-0	2	0	0	0	0
Kailon Nicholls	G	3	0-0	0-0	0-0	1	0	0	0	0
Jakub Necas	F	2	0-0	0-0	0-0	0	0	0	0	0

Advanced Game Stats

67.2Possessions67.2

92.3Offensive Efficiency98.2

98.2Defensive Efficiency92.3

-6.0Net Efficiency6.0

47.2%Effective FG%49.1%

52.3%True Shooting %50.7%

29.3%Turnover Rate16.6%

20.4%Free Throw Rate25.9%

33.3%3-Point Rate31.0%

0.65Assist / Turnover1.45

Game Summary

Duquesne won by 4 points. The game played at approximately 67.2 possessions. The largest advanced-stat separations came in Turnover Rate, Net Efficiency, Offensive Efficiency.

Advanced game metrics are calculated by Mid-Major Hoops from team box-score totals. Possessions are estimated. Highlighted advanced values indicate the stronger result for that metric; lower is better for defensive efficiency and turnover rate.