
Grand Canyon
20-12GAME THAT MATTERSAT
48.4%Grand Canyon
51.6%UT Rio Grande Valley
MMH WIN PROBABILITY
MODEL SPREADUT Rio Grande Valley -1.4
PROJECTED TOTAL145.7
MODEL MONEYLINEUT Rio Grande Valley -107

UT Rio Grande Valley
19-14MMH MODEL PROJECTION
Projected ScoreGrand Canyon 72
Projected Total145.7
Projected ScoreUT Rio Grande Valley 74
Team Comparison
59.8MMH Power Index55.8
109.2Offensive Efficiency112.6
99.1Defensive Efficiency103.1
10.1Net Efficiency9.5
2.0Strength of Schedule-1.9
9.7Last 10 Net Efficiency12.3
69.3Tempo67.4
52.1%Effective FG%55.7%
17.6%Turnover Rate17.9%
31.2%Offensive Rebound %29.2%
41.0%Free Throw Rate29.6%
7.0Average Margin6.4
MMH GAME INTELLIGENCE
MODEL READ
Grand Canyon HAS THE EDGE
WIN PROBABILITY51.6%
STATISTICAL ADVANTAGE
8–3
MMH comparison metrics
WHERE THE EDGE COMES FROMGrand Canyon holds the advantage in MMH Power Index (59.8–55.8), defensive efficiency (99.1–103.1), net efficiency (10.1–9.5), strength of schedule (2.0–-1.9).
UT Rio Grande Valley COUNTERS WITHoffensive efficiency (112.6–109.2), recent form (12.3–9.7), shooting efficiency (55.7–52.1).