Tennessee State

23-10

GAME THAT MATTERSAT

72.1%Tennessee State

27.9%Alabama A&M

MMH WIN PROBABILITY

MODEL SPREADTennessee State -5.4

PROJECTED TOTAL151.5

MODEL MONEYLINETennessee State -258

Alabama A&M

18-15

MMH MODEL PROJECTION

Projected ScoreTennessee State 78

Projected Total151.5

Projected ScoreAlabama A&M 73

Team Comparison

Tennessee StateMetricAlabama A&M

55.4MMH Power Index42.3

110.9Offensive Efficiency105.9

102.7Defensive Efficiency106.6

8.2Net Efficiency-0.7

-3.1Strength of Schedule-6.8

13.7Last 10 Net Efficiency3.3

72.4Tempo68.0

50.9%Effective FG%49.7%

17.0%Turnover Rate16.8%

34.8%Offensive Rebound %28.0%

34.7%Free Throw Rate45.7%

5.9Average Margin-0.5

MMH GAME INTELLIGENCE

MODEL READ

Tennessee State HAS THE EDGE

WIN PROBABILITY72.1%

STATISTICAL ADVANTAGE

9–2

MMH comparison metrics

WHERE THE EDGE COMES FROMTennessee State holds the advantage in MMH Power Index (55.4–42.3), offensive efficiency (110.9–105.9), defensive efficiency (102.7–106.6), net efficiency (8.2–-0.7).

Alabama A&M COUNTERS WITHball security (16.8–17.0), free throw rate (45.7–34.7).

Final

Tennessee State

83—85

Alabama A&M

Alabama A&M by 2 • 80.5 estimated possessions

Team Stats

Tennessee StateTEAM STATAlabama A&M

29-70FG25-58

41.0%FG%43.0%

8-243PT4-13

33.0%3PT%31.0%

17-26FT31-39

65.0%FT%79.0%

42Rebounds41

17Offensive Rebounds13

19Assists10

16Turnovers16

10Steals7

2Blocks7

24Fouls19

Player Box Score

Tennessee State

Player	Pos	Min	FG	3PT	FT	REB	AST	STL	BLK	PTS
Kinyon Hodges	Guard	40	8-14	2-4	1-3	6	4	5	0	19
EJ Bellinger	Guard	27	7-12	2-5	3-4	4	1	1	1	19
Christian Brown	Guard	32	6-17	3-9	2-4	7	3	1	0	17
Jaylen Jones	G	40	3-8	0-0	7-11	6	6	1	0	13
Marcus Fitzgerald Jr.	G	29	1-8	0-3	2-2	2	3	1	0	4
David Acosta	Forward	18	2-4	0-0	0-0	2	1	0	0	4
Michael Shanks	Forward	18	1-3	0-1	2-2	4	1	0	0	4
Knute Wood	Guard	11	1-4	1-2	0-0	2	0	1	0	3
Justin Williams	Guard	10	0-0	0-0	0-0	0	0	0	1	0

Alabama A&M

Player	Pos	Min	FG	3PT	FT	REB	AST	STL	BLK	PTS
Omari Peek	Guard	26	6-11	0-1	8-9	3	0	1	1	20
Dailin Smith	G	40	1-7	0-1	11-14	5	1	1	0	13
Lorenzo Downey	Guard	33	4-7	3-5	1-2	6	1	1	1	12
Caleb Blackwell	G	29	5-9	1-2	0-1	5	4	0	0	11
Dylan Mclean	Guard	29	2-7	0-2	6-6	5	0	1	0	10
Jayland Randall	G	18	3-6	0-0	0-0	5	3	1	1	6
AC Bryant	G	22	2-5	0-1	0-1	6	1	1	1	4
William Tavares	Center	6	1-2	0-1	2-2	2	0	0	1	4
Chad Moodie	F	4	0-0	0-0	3-4	0	0	0	0	3
EJ Williams	Center	11	1-4	0-0	0-0	2	0	0	1	2
Darius Osborne	Forward	4	0-0	0-0	0-0	0	0	0	1	0
London Riley	Guard	3	0-0	0-0	0-0	0	0	1	0	0

Advanced Game Stats

80.5Possessions80.5

103.1Offensive Efficiency105.6

105.6Defensive Efficiency103.1

-2.5Net Efficiency2.5

47.1%Effective FG%46.6%

50.4%True Shooting %55.5%

19.7%Turnover Rate20.1%

37.1%Free Throw Rate67.2%

34.3%3-Point Rate22.4%

1.19Assist / Turnover0.63

Game Summary

Alabama A&M won by 2 points. The game played at approximately 80.5 possessions. The largest advanced-stat separations came in Free Throw Rate, True Shooting %, Net Efficiency.

Advanced game metrics are calculated by Mid-Major Hoops from team box-score totals. Possessions are estimated. Highlighted advanced values indicate the stronger result for that metric; lower is better for defensive efficiency and turnover rate.