
Dayton
25-12GAME THAT MATTERSAT
31.0%Dayton
69.0%SMU
MMH WIN PROBABILITY
MODEL SPREADSMU -6.1
PROJECTED TOTAL155.2
MODEL MONEYLINESMU -223

SMU
20-14MMH MODEL PROJECTION
Projected ScoreDayton 75
Projected Total155.2
Projected ScoreSMU 81
Team Comparison
59.9MMH Power Index62.5
108.5Offensive Efficiency118.2
101.5Defensive Efficiency109.6
7.0Net Efficiency8.6
5.7Strength of Schedule7.0
6.4Last 10 Net Efficiency-1.3
68.3Tempo71.1
52.0%Effective FG%55.7%
16.9%Turnover Rate15.7%
26.7%Offensive Rebound %35.0%
47.6%Free Throw Rate31.3%
4.8Average Margin6.1
MMH GAME INTELLIGENCE
MODEL READ
SMU HAS THE EDGE
WIN PROBABILITY69.0%
STATISTICAL ADVANTAGE
8–3
MMH comparison metrics
WHERE THE EDGE COMES FROMSMU holds the advantage in MMH Power Index (62.5–59.9), offensive efficiency (118.2–108.5), net efficiency (8.6–7.0), strength of schedule (7.0–5.7).
Dayton COUNTERS WITHdefensive efficiency (101.5–109.6), recent form (6.4–-1.3), free throw rate (47.6–31.3).