Abilene Christian

14-19

GAME THAT MATTERSAT

21.2%Abilene Christian

78.8%UT Arlington

MMH WIN PROBABILITY

MODEL SPREADUT Arlington -9.8

PROJECTED TOTAL139.2

MODEL MONEYLINEUT Arlington -372

UT Arlington

18-14

MMH MODEL PROJECTION

Projected ScoreAbilene Christian 65

Projected Total139.2

Projected ScoreUT Arlington 74

Team Comparison

Abilene ChristianMetricUT Arlington

42.4MMH Power Index49.6

101.1Offensive Efficiency102.7

104.1Defensive Efficiency97.9

-3.0Net Efficiency4.8

-1.4Strength of Schedule-0.8

-5.3Last 10 Net Efficiency-3.9

69.6Tempo68.1

48.9%Effective FG%48.5%

20.6%Turnover Rate20.4%

32.4%Offensive Rebound %36.0%

42.0%Free Throw Rate43.7%

-2.1Average Margin3.3

MMH GAME INTELLIGENCE

MODEL READ

UT Arlington HAS THE EDGE

WIN PROBABILITY78.8%

STATISTICAL ADVANTAGE

10–1

MMH comparison metrics

WHERE THE EDGE COMES FROMUT Arlington holds the advantage in MMH Power Index (49.6–42.4), offensive efficiency (102.7–101.1), defensive efficiency (97.9–104.1), net efficiency (4.8–-3.0).

Abilene Christian COUNTERS WITHshooting efficiency (48.9–48.5).

Final

Abilene Christian

71—86

UT Arlington

UT Arlington by 15 • 73.2 estimated possessions

Team Stats

Abilene ChristianTEAM STATUT Arlington

25-55FG27-47

45.0%FG%57.0%

8-173PT12-22

47.0%3PT%55.0%

13-19FT20-28

68.0%FT%71.0%

25Rebounds31

6Offensive Rebounds5

20Assists25

15Turnovers18

11Steals9

1Blocks4

22Fouls18

Player Box Score

Abilene Christian

Player	Pos	Min	FG	3PT	FT	REB	AST	STL	BLK	PTS
Hunter Jack Madden	Guard	33	5-8	3-5	6-7	1	7	3	0	19
Airion Simmons	Forward	27	6-9	2-4	3-5	3	1	1	0	17
Ali Dibba	G	34	5-16	1-2	3-4	7	3	2	1	14
JV Seat	G	20	4-10	1-3	0-1	3	1	0	0	9
Cameron Steele	Forward	28	3-5	1-2	0-0	2	1	1	0	7
Immanuel Allen	Guard	15	1-2	0-0	1-2	3	0	0	0	3
Nasir DeGruy	Guard	7	1-3	0-0	0-0	1	1	0	0	2
Kavion McClain	F	19	0-1	0-1	0-0	1	6	4	0	0
Aidan Igiehon	Forward	7	0-1	0-0	0-0	1	0	0	0	0
Yaniel Rivera	G	4	0-0	0-0	0-0	0	0	0	0	0
Leonardo Bettiol	F	3	0-0	0-0	0-0	0	0	0	0	0
Muodubem Muoneke	Guard	3	0-0	0-0	0-0	0	0	0	0	0

UT Arlington

Player	Pos	Min	FG	3PT	FT	REB	AST	STL	BLK	PTS
DaJuan Gordon	Guard	33	5-9	2-4	4-4	4	5	4	0	16
Akili Vining	Guard	26	5-9	2-4	2-3	0	2	1	1	14
Brandyn Talbot	Guard	26	5-8	4-6	0-0	2	2	0	0	14
Shemar Wilson	Forward	33	3-5	0-0	7-12	11	3	1	1	13
Kade Douglas	G	19	3-6	3-6	0-0	2	4	0	0	9
Aaron Cash	Guard	21	3-4	1-2	1-1	6	1	1	1	8
Makaih Williams	G	32	1-3	0-0	5-6	3	8	2	1	7
Dwayne Koroma	F	10	2-3	0-0	1-2	1	0	0	0	5

Advanced Game Stats

73.2Possessions73.2

97.0Offensive Efficiency117.5

117.5Defensive Efficiency97.0

-20.5Net Efficiency20.5

52.7%Effective FG%70.2%

55.4%True Shooting %71.3%

20.5%Turnover Rate24.6%

34.5%Free Throw Rate59.6%

30.9%3-Point Rate46.8%

1.33Assist / Turnover1.39

Game Summary

UT Arlington won by 15 points. The game played at approximately 73.2 possessions. The largest advanced-stat separations came in Net Efficiency, Free Throw Rate, Offensive Efficiency.

Advanced game metrics are calculated by Mid-Major Hoops from team box-score totals. Possessions are estimated. Highlighted advanced values indicate the stronger result for that metric; lower is better for defensive efficiency and turnover rate.