
Merrimack
23-11GAME THAT MATTERSAT
43.4%Merrimack
56.6%Georgetown
MMH WIN PROBABILITY
MODEL SPREADGeorgetown -2.6
PROJECTED TOTAL131.8
MODEL MONEYLINEGeorgetown -130

Georgetown
13-18MMH MODEL PROJECTION
Projected ScoreMerrimack 65
Projected Total131.8
Projected ScoreGeorgetown 67
Team Comparison
53.7MMH Power Index51.5
106.4Offensive Efficiency107.2
103.2Defensive Efficiency107.4
3.2Net Efficiency-0.2
0.7Strength of Schedule4.4
12.9Last 10 Net Efficiency-4.8
64.4Tempo61.7
49.3%Effective FG%49.2%
14.8%Turnover Rate16.4%
24.7%Offensive Rebound %32.3%
39.5%Free Throw Rate38.3%
2.1Average Margin-0.1
MMH GAME INTELLIGENCE
MODEL READ
Merrimack HAS THE EDGE
WIN PROBABILITY56.6%
STATISTICAL ADVANTAGE
8–3
MMH comparison metrics
WHERE THE EDGE COMES FROMMerrimack holds the advantage in MMH Power Index (53.7–51.5), defensive efficiency (103.2–107.4), net efficiency (3.2–-0.2), recent form (12.9–-4.8).
Georgetown COUNTERS WITHoffensive efficiency (107.2–106.4), strength of schedule (4.4–0.7), offensive rebounding (32.3–24.7).