
Binghamton
8-22GAME THAT MATTERSAT
8.8%Binghamton
91.2%Colgate
MMH WIN PROBABILITY
MODEL SPREADColgate -15.6
PROJECTED TOTAL144.9
MODEL MONEYLINEColgate -1036

Colgate
18-15MMH MODEL PROJECTION
Projected ScoreBinghamton 65
Projected Total144.9
Projected ScoreColgate 80
Team Comparison
32.4MMH Power Index48.8
102.2Offensive Efficiency111.7
112.3Defensive Efficiency109.0
-10.1Net Efficiency2.7
-6.0Strength of Schedule-2.0
-6.2Last 10 Net Efficiency-0.3
64.2Tempo68.4
51.3%Effective FG%54.5%
18.5%Turnover Rate14.8%
21.5%Offensive Rebound %26.9%
42.8%Free Throw Rate30.0%
-6.5Average Margin1.8
MMH GAME INTELLIGENCE
MODEL READ
Colgate HAS THE EDGE
WIN PROBABILITY91.2%
STATISTICAL ADVANTAGE
10–1
MMH comparison metrics
WHERE THE EDGE COMES FROMColgate holds the advantage in MMH Power Index (48.8–32.4), offensive efficiency (111.7–102.2), defensive efficiency (109.0–112.3), net efficiency (2.7–-10.1).
Binghamton COUNTERS WITHfree throw rate (42.8–30.0).