
Boston College
11-20GAME THAT MATTERSAT
4.1%Boston College
95.9%Vanderbilt
MMH WIN PROBABILITY
MODEL SPREADVanderbilt -21.2
PROJECTED TOTAL151.0
MODEL MONEYLINEVanderbilt -2339

Vanderbilt
27-9MMH MODEL PROJECTION
Projected ScoreBoston College 65
Projected Total151.0
Projected ScoreVanderbilt 86
Team Comparison
45.1MMH Power Index68.9
100.0Offensive Efficiency120.9
104.8Defensive Efficiency105.7
-4.8Net Efficiency15.2
4.8Strength of Schedule7.4
-14.3Last 10 Net Efficiency2.7
67.4Tempo70.9
47.1%Effective FG%55.3%
15.4%Turnover Rate13.5%
28.1%Offensive Rebound %30.8%
33.2%Free Throw Rate39.3%
-3.3Average Margin10.8
MMH GAME INTELLIGENCE
MODEL READ
Vanderbilt HAS THE EDGE
WIN PROBABILITY95.9%
STATISTICAL ADVANTAGE
10–1
MMH comparison metrics
WHERE THE EDGE COMES FROMVanderbilt holds the advantage in MMH Power Index (68.9–45.1), offensive efficiency (120.9–100.0), net efficiency (15.2–-4.8), strength of schedule (7.4–4.8).
Boston College COUNTERS WITHdefensive efficiency (104.8–105.7).