UT Martin

22-11

GAME THAT MATTERSAT

50.4%UT Martin

49.6%Rice

MMH WIN PROBABILITY

MODEL SPREADUT Martin -0.8

PROJECTED TOTAL140.4

MODEL MONEYLINEUT Martin -102

Rice

13-18

MMH MODEL PROJECTION

Projected ScoreUT Martin 71

Projected Total140.4

Projected ScoreRice 70

Team Comparison

UT MartinMetricRice

49.8MMH Power Index45.1

103.8Offensive Efficiency108.3

94.0Defensive Efficiency109.2

9.8Net Efficiency-0.9

-4.8Strength of Schedule-2.2

-0.8Last 10 Net Efficiency-4.3

67.2Tempo68.3

49.5%Effective FG%49.7%

21.4%Turnover Rate17.8%

37.9%Offensive Rebound %35.7%

37.5%Free Throw Rate34.7%

6.6Average Margin-0.6

MMH GAME INTELLIGENCE

MODEL READ

UT Martin HAS THE EDGE

WIN PROBABILITY50.4%

STATISTICAL ADVANTAGE

7–4

MMH comparison metrics

WHERE THE EDGE COMES FROMUT Martin holds the advantage in MMH Power Index (49.8–45.1), defensive efficiency (94.0–109.2), net efficiency (9.8–-0.9), recent form (-0.8–-4.3).

Rice COUNTERS WITHoffensive efficiency (108.3–103.8), strength of schedule (-2.2–-4.8), shooting efficiency (49.7–49.5).

Final

UT Martin

78—98

Rice

Rice by 20 • 79.1 estimated possessions

Team Stats

UT MartinTEAM STATRice

27-67FG37-73

40.0%FG%51.0%

13-303PT8-28

43.0%3PT%29.0%

11-11FT16-23

100.0%FT%70.0%

33Rebounds48

6Offensive Rebounds14

16Assists19

13Turnovers9

3Steals9

1Blocks4

16Fouls12

Player Box Score

UT Martin

Player	Pos	Min	FG	3PT	FT	REB	AST	STL	BLK	PTS
Jacob Crews	G	29	7-13	3-8	5-5	7	1	1	0	22
Justus Jackson	Guard	20	5-11	3-6	0-0	0	1	0	0	13
Issa Muhammad	Forward	29	5-12	1-2	0-0	9	0	1	0	11
Desmond Williams	Guard	16	3-6	3-5	0-0	1	1	0	0	9
Jordan Sears	Guard	29	2-12	0-2	4-4	4	9	1	0	8
KK Curry	Forward	15	3-6	1-2	0-0	1	1	0	0	7
Sebastian Mendoza	Guard	21	1-2	1-2	0-0	2	2	0	0	3
Koby Jeffries	Guard	19	1-3	1-2	0-0	2	1	0	1	3
Christian Fussell	Forward	11	0-0	0-0	2-2	2	0	0	0	2
Jalen Myers	F	7	0-2	0-1	0-0	1	0	0	0	0
David Kamwanga	Forward	4	0-0	0-0	0-0	1	0	0	0	0

Rice

Player	Pos	Min	FG	3PT	FT	REB	AST	STL	BLK	PTS
Travis Evee	Guard	27	10-17	5-9	4-4	5	4	2	0	29
Mekhi Mason	G	28	5-17	0-7	7-9	6	3	1	0	17
Alem Huseinovic	Guard	26	5-9	0-4	1-1	0	1	1	0	11
Andrew Akuchie	F	11	3-3	0-0	3-4	5	0	0	1	9
Ifeanyi Ufochukwu	C	6	3-4	0-0	1-2	0	0	0	0	7
Max Fiedler	Forward	23	3-3	0-0	0-1	11	6	1	1	6
Noah Shelby	G	21	2-5	2-2	0-0	4	1	1	0	6
Sam Alajiki	Forward	12	2-3	1-2	0-0	6	0	0	0	5
Keanu Dawes	F	26	2-7	0-3	0-2	4	1	3	1	4
Gabe Warren	G	11	1-2	0-1	0-0	4	3	0	1	2
Jackson Peakes	Guard	2	1-1	0-0	0-0	0	0	0	0	2
Camp Wagner	G	5	0-2	0-0	0-0	0	0	0	0	0
George Perkins	F	2	0-0	0-0	0-0	1	0	0	0	0

Advanced Game Stats

79.1Possessions79.1

98.6Offensive Efficiency123.9

123.9Defensive Efficiency98.6

-25.3Net Efficiency25.3

50.0%Effective FG%56.2%

54.0%True Shooting %58.4%

16.4%Turnover Rate11.4%

16.4%Free Throw Rate31.5%

44.8%3-Point Rate38.4%

1.23Assist / Turnover2.11

Game Summary

Rice won by 20 points. The game played at approximately 79.1 possessions. The largest advanced-stat separations came in Net Efficiency, Offensive Efficiency, Defensive Efficiency.

Advanced game metrics are calculated by Mid-Major Hoops from team box-score totals. Possessions are estimated. Highlighted advanced values indicate the stronger result for that metric; lower is better for defensive efficiency and turnover rate.