
Incarnate Word
12-19GAME THAT MATTERSAT
38.6%Incarnate Word
61.4%Bethune-Cookman
MMH WIN PROBABILITY
MODEL SPREADBethune-Cookman -3.1
PROJECTED TOTAL152.4
MODEL MONEYLINEBethune-Cookman -159

Bethune-Cookman
17-15MMH MODEL PROJECTION
Projected ScoreIncarnate Word 75
Projected Total152.4
Projected ScoreBethune-Cookman 78
Team Comparison
44.6MMH Power Index44.2
112.0Offensive Efficiency104.7
111.2Defensive Efficiency106.9
0.8Net Efficiency-2.2
-3.6Strength of Schedule-3.3
-8.5Last 10 Net Efficiency4.0
66.3Tempo72.0
52.2%Effective FG%51.9%
16.8%Turnover Rate19.2%
34.4%Offensive Rebound %30.3%
34.0%Free Throw Rate41.9%
0.5Average Margin-1.6
MMH GAME INTELLIGENCE
MODEL READ
Incarnate Word HAS THE EDGE
WIN PROBABILITY61.4%
STATISTICAL ADVANTAGE
7–4
MMH comparison metrics
WHERE THE EDGE COMES FROMIncarnate Word holds the advantage in MMH Power Index (44.6–44.2), offensive efficiency (112.0–104.7), net efficiency (0.8–-2.2), shooting efficiency (52.2–51.9).
Bethune-Cookman COUNTERS WITHdefensive efficiency (106.9–111.2), strength of schedule (-3.3–-3.6), recent form (4.0–-8.5).