
Grambling
14-19GAME THAT MATTERSAT
7.1%Grambling
92.9%Dayton
MMH WIN PROBABILITY
MODEL SPREADDayton -15.9
PROJECTED TOTAL142.1
MODEL MONEYLINEDayton -1308

Dayton
25-12MMH MODEL PROJECTION
Projected ScoreGrambling 63
Projected Total142.1
Projected ScoreDayton 79
Team Comparison
41.4MMH Power Index59.9
100.7Offensive Efficiency108.5
100.4Defensive Efficiency101.5
0.3Net Efficiency7.0
-5.7Strength of Schedule5.7
-0.4Last 10 Net Efficiency6.4
69.9Tempo68.3
49.2%Effective FG%52.0%
20.9%Turnover Rate16.9%
30.4%Offensive Rebound %26.7%
42.2%Free Throw Rate47.6%
0.2Average Margin4.8
MMH GAME INTELLIGENCE
MODEL READ
Dayton HAS THE EDGE
WIN PROBABILITY92.9%
STATISTICAL ADVANTAGE
9–2
MMH comparison metrics
WHERE THE EDGE COMES FROMDayton holds the advantage in MMH Power Index (59.9–41.4), offensive efficiency (108.5–100.7), net efficiency (7.0–0.3), strength of schedule (5.7–-5.7).
Grambling COUNTERS WITHdefensive efficiency (100.4–101.5), offensive rebounding (30.4–26.7).