Binghamton

8-22

GAME THAT MATTERSAT

24.6%Binghamton

75.4%Stonehill

MMH WIN PROBABILITY

MODEL SPREADStonehill -8.8

PROJECTED TOTAL135.2

MODEL MONEYLINEStonehill -307

Stonehill

12-21

MMH MODEL PROJECTION

Projected ScoreBinghamton 63

Projected Total135.2

Projected ScoreStonehill 72

Team Comparison

BinghamtonMetricStonehill

32.4MMH Power Index37.9

102.2Offensive Efficiency97.5

112.3Defensive Efficiency100.7

-10.1Net Efficiency-3.2

-6.0Strength of Schedule-5.4

-6.2Last 10 Net Efficiency-3.4

64.2Tempo68.1

51.3%Effective FG%48.0%

18.5%Turnover Rate19.1%

21.5%Offensive Rebound %28.4%

42.8%Free Throw Rate29.2%

-6.5Average Margin-2.2

MMH GAME INTELLIGENCE

MODEL READ

Stonehill HAS THE EDGE

WIN PROBABILITY75.4%

STATISTICAL ADVANTAGE

7–4

MMH comparison metrics

WHERE THE EDGE COMES FROMStonehill holds the advantage in MMH Power Index (37.9–32.4), defensive efficiency (100.7–112.3), net efficiency (-3.2–-10.1), strength of schedule (-5.4–-6.0).

Binghamton COUNTERS WITHoffensive efficiency (102.2–97.5), shooting efficiency (51.3–48.0), ball security (18.5–19.1).

Final

Binghamton

79—64

Stonehill

Binghamton by 15 • 70.1 estimated possessions

Team Stats

BinghamtonTEAM STATStonehill

28-61FG23-62

46.0%FG%37.0%

6-163PT8-23

38.0%3PT%35.0%

17-22FT10-12

77.0%FT%83.0%

46Rebounds31

12Offensive Rebounds7

13Assists8

12Turnovers8

5Steals6

7Blocks5

15Fouls21

Player Box Score

Binghamton

Player	Pos	Min	FG	3PT	FT	REB	AST	STL	BLK	PTS
Tymu Chenery	Guard	39	7-9	2-2	6-8	4	3	0	5	22
Nehemiah Benson	Forward	25	7-12	0-0	3-3	9	0	0	1	17
Chris Walker	G	20	4-11	3-7	3-3	3	0	2	0	14
Symir Torrence	Guard	38	3-8	0-2	5-5	7	8	2	0	11
Armon Harried	Guard	28	5-10	0-1	0-1	3	2	0	1	10
Gavin Walsh	F	24	1-8	1-4	0-2	10	0	1	0	3
Taveion White	Forward	23	1-3	0-0	0-0	4	0	0	0	2
Evan Ashe	G	3	0-0	0-0	0-0	0	0	0	0	0

Stonehill

Player	Pos	Min	FG	3PT	FT	REB	AST	STL	BLK	PTS
Max Zegarowski	Forward	39	7-17	2-7	4-4	7	1	0	0	20
Tony Felder	Guard	32	5-13	3-5	6-7	3	1	0	0	19
Jackson Benigni	G	31	5-15	2-5	0-1	1	0	2	0	12
Louie Semona III	F	24	3-9	0-2	0-0	4	2	2	0	6
Pano Pavlidis	Forward	34	2-4	0-1	0-0	8	4	1	2	4
Chas Stinson	G	10	1-1	1-1	0-0	0	0	0	0	3
Ethan Meuser	F	17	0-3	0-2	0-0	1	0	0	2	0
Nathan McGill	Guard	11	0-0	0-0	0-0	4	0	1	1	0
Thatcher Stone	G	2	0-0	0-0	0-0	0	0	0	0	0

Advanced Game Stats

70.1Possessions70.1

112.7Offensive Efficiency91.3

91.3Defensive Efficiency112.7

21.4Net Efficiency-21.4

50.8%Effective FG%43.5%

55.3%True Shooting %47.3%

16.8%Turnover Rate11.6%

36.1%Free Throw Rate19.4%

26.2%3-Point Rate37.1%

1.08Assist / Turnover1.00

Game Summary

Binghamton won by 15 points. The game played at approximately 70.1 possessions. The largest advanced-stat separations came in Net Efficiency, Offensive Efficiency, Defensive Efficiency.

Advanced game metrics are calculated by Mid-Major Hoops from team box-score totals. Possessions are estimated. Highlighted advanced values indicate the stronger result for that metric; lower is better for defensive efficiency and turnover rate.